2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2018.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DoS-resilient cooperative beacon verification for vehicular communication systems

Abstract: Authenticated safety beacons in Vehicular Communication (VC) systems ensure awareness among neighboring vehicles. However, the verification of beacon signatures introduces significant processing overhead for resource-constrained vehicular On-Board Units (OBUs). Even worse in dense neighborhood or when a clogging Denial of Service (DoS) attack is mounted. The OBU would fail to verify for all received (authentic or fictitious) beacons. This could significantly delay the verifications of authentic beacons or even… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond vehicle sharing security and privacy, vehicular communications security and privacy received extensive attention over the years [46], [87], [88]. Recent results focus, for example, on scalable systems, notably for credential management [46], [89], [90], pseudonymous certificates for vehicle tracking protection [91], and decentralized cooperative defenses [92], [93]. Moreover, Qi et al [94] proposed an enhanced scheme of [95], namely, DUBI, a decentralized and privacy-preserving usage-based insurance scheme built on the blockchain technology to address privacy concerns for pay-asyou-drive insurances using zero-knowledge proofs and smart contracts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond vehicle sharing security and privacy, vehicular communications security and privacy received extensive attention over the years [46], [87], [88]. Recent results focus, for example, on scalable systems, notably for credential management [46], [89], [90], pseudonymous certificates for vehicle tracking protection [91], and decentralized cooperative defenses [92], [93]. Moreover, Qi et al [94] proposed an enhanced scheme of [95], namely, DUBI, a decentralized and privacy-preserving usage-based insurance scheme built on the blockchain technology to address privacy concerns for pay-asyou-drive insurances using zero-knowledge proofs and smart contracts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The creation and verification of a digital signature for each beacon would introduce significant overhead due to the relatively high beacon rate (≈ 10 beacon s −1 ). This would be costly for the APs and not sustainable for constrained mobile devices, enabling clogging or resource depletion Denial of Service (DoS) attacks [31].…”
Section: Safeguarding Time-based Gnss Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is computationally expensive to verify the broadcast messages and the scheme is vulnerable to denial of service attacks. The authors of [13] adopted periodic broadcasts of commitment keys at a fixed time intervals in their cooperative message verification scheme. However, they did not evaluate its performance and did not provide the time interval that should be used for the periodic distribution.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%