DoS attack-tolerant TESLA-based broadcast authentication protocol in Internet of Things

Ruan, Na; Hori, Yoshiaki

doi:10.1109/icost.2012.6271291

Cited by 28 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Moreover, the existence of batteries for sensor nodes utilizing cryptography decreases the lifetime of sensor node. There are a few important security management protocols in wireless sensor systems like SPIN [1] which comprises of two secure building squares: SNEP [2] and the other protocol named μTESLA [3]. Between both of the above, SNEP incorporates data security, di-party data approval, as well as confirmation of data integrity.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Emerging Security Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks

2019

ijrte

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) is falls under overwhelming and surging technology that shows extraordinary guarantee for different advanced potential applications like military, atomic power plant, human services and so forth, where security is a basic issue. These systems are generally utilized as a part of different conditions that likewise incorporates open condition, unattended nature, a few asset limitations, remote and shared correspondence, un-trusted and broadband transmissions between them, that have different imperatives like low calculation ability, restricted memory, decreased battery existence, absence of foundation that forces safety as an extra difficult undertaking. In this paper a point-by-point examination on the safety related problems in WSN are made. Likewise, a brief on different security systems with proficient power conservation procedures is shown in a table. Comparison of all the security protocols are based on the technique used to give security in wireless sensor networks, the framework used or model used, the key mechanism they are using to provide the best security they can give, which all performance parameters they are improving in terms of energy consumption or increasing network age or reducing some unwanted network performance affecting characteristics and also on what kind of security they are providing and up to which extend they are providing security while transmitting the packets from one end to other end.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Emerging Security Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks

2019

ijrte

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this modified scheme of TESLA that is TESLA++, the receiver shall store only the MAC address until it obtains the delayed key. This is done basically to reduce the memory requirement as just the shortened version of the sender's data is stored by the receiver [14]. Moreover, TESLA++ is much more secure method of authentication than TESLA.…”

Section: Tesla++mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The design of TESLA is done basically for the broadcasting authentication in wireless ad-hoc network. TESLA is resilient to computational DOS attack because the technique symmetric cryptography is swifter than the use of signature which helps a great deal avoiding the delays, however TESLA is prone to attacks due to memory based denial of services [14] and this is the basic reason behind the development of TESLA++. The main concept behind TESLA is that to each packet a MAC (Message authentication code) is attached which is computed with a key K which is known to the user itself.…”

Section: Security Challenges Authentication Application and Trust Mmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The procedure for authenticating user validity in TESLA++ is detailed in. The paper [14] also proposes method to reject the unimportant MAC's that helps release memory in case of flooding that served to be a disadvantage in TESLA encoding. A mathematical representation of the encoded message using the two keys is given as.…”

Section: Tesla++mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This is basically utilized as an authentication tool for multicast and broadcast network [14]. TESLA is completely a different technique as compared to PKI when it comes to user authentication TESLA makes use of symmetric cryptographic function with delayed key disclosure that provides the necessary elements of asymmetry.…”

Section: Security Challenges Authentication Application and Trust Mmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Security Challenges, Authentication, Application and Trust Models for Vehicular Ad Hoc Network- A Survey

Vaibhav¹,

Shukla²,

Das³

et al. 2017

IJWMT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Vehicular Ad hoc Network could manage the various critical issues of road transport. That is why it is the most crucial field of research for most of the researchers. This survey paper discusses various issues related to Security Challenges, Security Architecture actors, Security Authentication, Application Constraints, various trust models etc. this paper encourages you to think about various fields of work need to be carried out in this field for the better VANET environment. Various schemes have been mentioned which could be improved further as per considering various real time conditions.

show abstract