Dorset and Thule divergence from east Central Asian roots

Abstract

The history of the immigration of East Asians to America during the last glacial period remains controversial. In an attempt to add critical data to this problem, a large sample of whole teeth derived from Southeast Asian, Mongolian, Thule, Western Inuit, and pre-Inca (Huari) people was quantified (N = 4,507 teeth from 495 individuals; approximately 30 variables per tooth). Multivariate analysis helped establish that all Native Americans were likely derived from one ancient, extinct population that resided in the region of Mongolia (east Central Asia), and that Mongolians and Southeast Asians are two independent groups. A controversial and enigmatic Central Canadian Arctic "Thule culture Inuit" group on Southampton Island that survived until 1902 was identified as a relic, mainly Paleoeskimo Dorset community. Surprisingly, there was little, or no, indication of Dorset-to-Thule gene flow. Cumulatively, the data suggest that a small population of Paleoindian founders remained resident in Beringia, may have blocked further immigration, and were the antecedents to the Thule/Inuit. With the confluence of the Arctic and Pacific oceans at the breakup of Beringia, the resulting increased availability of marine animal food sources allowed this population to increase in size and expand throughout the eastern Arctic.

Comments on Coltrain et al., Journal of Archaeological Science 31, 2004 “Sealing, whaling and caribou: the skeletal isotope chemistry of eastern Arctic foragers”, and Coltrain, Journal of Archaeological Science 36, 2009 “Sealing, whaling and caribou revisited: additional insights from the skeletal isotope chemistry of eastern Arctic foragers”

“…The Sadlermiut have been identified as a remnant Dorset group with Neoeskimo influences (Collins, 1955a(Collins, , 1955b(Collins, , 1956a(Collins, , 1956c(Collins, , 1958de Laguna, 1947de Laguna, , 1979Shields and Jones, 1998), as Neoeskimos with Dorset traits (Clark, 1980(Clark, , 1981, and as a regionalized Neoeskimo population (Merbs, 1983(Merbs, , 2002Merbs and Wilson, 1962;Rowley, 1994). Neighboring Inuit referred to them as Tuniit (Mathiassen, 1927b:186e192), although the Sadlermiut clearly denied this affiliation (Pitseolak and Eber, 1975:33).…”