2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(02)00477-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dopplersonographic measurement of global cerebral circulation time using echo contrast-enhanced ultrasound in normal individuals and patients with arteriovenous malformations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

6
37
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite different technical approaches used, mean CCT values were within a narrow range of 5.6 ± 1.7 to 7.0 ± 1.3 seconds (own data: 6.3 ± 1.2 seconds) for Dopplersonographic and 7.5 ± 1.1 second for duplexsonographic techniques, corresponding well with historic angiographically determined CCTs of 4.9 to 5.6 seconds (Gilroy et al, 1963). In our study, the approach reported by Schreiber et al (2002) was used. The authors described three different mathematical CCT definitions, of which the CCT 2 , defined as the time interval between the turning points of the ICA and internal jugular vein timeintensity curves, yielded the lowest variabilities and best reproducibility results (Schreiber et al, 2002).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Despite different technical approaches used, mean CCT values were within a narrow range of 5.6 ± 1.7 to 7.0 ± 1.3 seconds (own data: 6.3 ± 1.2 seconds) for Dopplersonographic and 7.5 ± 1.1 second for duplexsonographic techniques, corresponding well with historic angiographically determined CCTs of 4.9 to 5.6 seconds (Gilroy et al, 1963). In our study, the approach reported by Schreiber et al (2002) was used. The authors described three different mathematical CCT definitions, of which the CCT 2 , defined as the time interval between the turning points of the ICA and internal jugular vein timeintensity curves, yielded the lowest variabilities and best reproducibility results (Schreiber et al, 2002).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reported mean CBF in the ultrasound studies ranged from 567 ± 125 (Dörfler et al, 2000) to 727 ± 102 mL/min (Scheel et al, 2000) depending on the investigated age groups, while we found a mean CBF of 733 ± 99 mL/min. Ultrasonographic measurement of global CCT has recently been demonstrated in healthy volunteers (Hoffmann et al, 2000;Schreiber et al, 2002Schreiber et al, , 2003. Despite different technical approaches used, mean CCT values were within a narrow range of 5.6 ± 1.7 to 7.0 ± 1.3 seconds (own data: 6.3 ± 1.2 seconds) for Dopplersonographic and 7.5 ± 1.1 second for duplexsonographic techniques, corresponding well with historic angiographically determined CCTs of 4.9 to 5.6 seconds (Gilroy et al, 1963).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations