2011
DOI: 10.1364/boe.2.002175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doppler velocity detection limitations in spectrometer-based versus swept-source optical coherence tomography

Abstract: Recent advances in Doppler techniques have enabled high sensitivity imaging of biological flow to measure blood velocities and vascular perfusion. Here we compare spectrometer-based and wavelength-swept Doppler OCT implementations theoretically and experimentally, characterizing the lower and upper observable velocity limits in each configuration. We specifically characterize the washout limit for Doppler OCT, the velocity at which signal degradation results in loss of flow information, which is valid for both… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
121
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
121
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1F). This en face choroidal image is achieved by taking advantage of the OCT signal void produced by interference fringe washout in regions of very high flow velocity (16).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1F). This en face choroidal image is achieved by taking advantage of the OCT signal void produced by interference fringe washout in regions of very high flow velocity (16).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suspect that fast flow rates of these vessels induce fringe washout of spectrometerbased OCT signals and cause the signal to drop below the noise level of the system. In that case, the loss of OCT intensity signal within these blood vessels also creates a lack of phase-shift information and pvOCT signal (18). To address this issue, we have applied a similar methodology to the visualization of choroidal vessels by an inversed minimum projection view of the phasevariance processed data segmented over Haller's layer (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we could assume that only the externally applied phase shift was effective when we consider the phase difference between two neighboring A-lines. Or the phase shift due to the sample surface variation could be ignored in a similar fashion when calculating the Doppler shift in Doppler OCT [23][24][25]. Figure 2 illustrates the schematic of the off-axis galvano scanner that gives the phase shift to the sample beam while sample scanning, which is necessary to construct a complex spectral interferogram.…”
Section: A Schematic and Methods Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%