2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doppler tomography and photometry of the cataclysmic variable 1RXS J064434.5+334451

Abstract: We have obtained simultaneous photometric and spectroscopic observations of the cataclysmic variable 1RXS J064434.5+334451. We have calibrated the spectra for slit losses using the simultaneous photometry allowing to construct reliable Doppler images from Hα and Heii 4686Å emission lines. We have improved the ephemeris of the object based on new photometric eclipse timings, obtaining HJD = 2453403.759533+ 0.26937446E. Some eclipses present a clear internal structure which we attribute to a central Heii emissio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows us to determine exactly the phase 0.0 of the system and make an effort to identify the definite locations of emission-line sources. However, as we already noted, the system parameters determined by Sing et al (2007), Hernández Santisteban (2012), Echevarria (2015), and Hernández Santisteban et al (2017) for 1RXS J064434.5+334451 do not agree.. Moreover, we note that the system parameters of Hernández Santisteban (2012) and Hernández Santisteban et al (2017) do not seem realistic because a secondary star with a mass of M2≥0.79M ⊙ , as it follows from their measurements, noticeably exceeds its Roche lobe for the given orbital period, regardless of whether it is on the main sequence or evolved 3 .…”
Section: Revisiting 1rxs J0644345+334451mentioning
confidence: 78%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This allows us to determine exactly the phase 0.0 of the system and make an effort to identify the definite locations of emission-line sources. However, as we already noted, the system parameters determined by Sing et al (2007), Hernández Santisteban (2012), Echevarria (2015), and Hernández Santisteban et al (2017) for 1RXS J064434.5+334451 do not agree.. Moreover, we note that the system parameters of Hernández Santisteban (2012) and Hernández Santisteban et al (2017) do not seem realistic because a secondary star with a mass of M2≥0.79M ⊙ , as it follows from their measurements, noticeably exceeds its Roche lobe for the given orbital period, regardless of whether it is on the main sequence or evolved 3 .…”
Section: Revisiting 1rxs J0644345+334451mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Spectra of 1RXS J064434.5+334451 were obtained by Hernández Santisteban (2012) and Hernández Santisteban et al (2017) using the same instrument/telescope set-up as in the case of RW Sex, at the same observatory. Moreover, they obtained the time-resolved photometry of the object with the 1.5-m telescope also located at OAN SPM.…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations