2013
DOI: 10.1246/cl.131119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doping Effect in Three-dimensional Donor–Acceptor Magnet: Percolated Magnetic Pathways Dominated by Local Electron Transfers

Abstract: In an electron-donor (D)electron-acceptor (A) three-dimensional assembly series with a D 2 A formulation, their magnetic properties were tuned by doping another D unit with a stronger electron-donating ability capable of reducing A ¹ to A 2¹ . The magnetic-phase-transition temperature (T c ) of doped compounds nonlinearly decreases with increasing doping rate.The control of magnetic behavior in a flexible framework of materials is an important topic of materials science, which has been carried out not only by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A clear distinction between the solvated and desolvated groups was found in local bond lengths in parts of [Ru 2 ] and TCNQMe 2 units, which clearly reflect the oxidation states of units demonstrated in previous work. , , For the [Ru 2 ] unit, Ru–O eq (O eq = carboxylate oxygen atom), bond distances were quite sensitive to the oxidation state of the [Ru 2 ] unit: 2.06–2.07 Å for [Ru 2 II,II ] and 2.01–2.03 Å for [Ru 2 II,III ] + . The Ru–O eq distances in 1 , 1-dry , 2 , and 2-dry are summarized in Table S2.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…A clear distinction between the solvated and desolvated groups was found in local bond lengths in parts of [Ru 2 ] and TCNQMe 2 units, which clearly reflect the oxidation states of units demonstrated in previous work. , , For the [Ru 2 ] unit, Ru–O eq (O eq = carboxylate oxygen atom), bond distances were quite sensitive to the oxidation state of the [Ru 2 ] unit: 2.06–2.07 Å for [Ru 2 II,II ] and 2.01–2.03 Å for [Ru 2 II,III ] + . The Ru–O eq distances in 1 , 1-dry , 2 , and 2-dry are summarized in Table S2.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Compounds 1 – 5 were synthesized using a method similar to that previously used to synthesize other [Ru 2 ] 2 TCNQ materials . The method allowed the slow mixing of two solutions by diffusion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found these charge/electron transfer mechanisms in D/A systems of metal–organic frameworks (we call these materials D/A-MOFs) constructed from the metal complex donors of carboxylate-bridged paddlewheel diruthenium(II, II) complexes (abbreviated as [Ru 2 II,II ] or [Ru 2 4+ ]) and organic polycyano acceptors such as TCNQ derivatives with x substitutions of R moieties (later abbreviated to TCNQR x ) and N , N ′-dicyanoquinonediimine (DCNQI) derivatives, , while several metal–TCNQR x high-dimensional frameworks have been known. These D/A combinations allowed the production of D 2 A , and DA , multidimensional systems based mainly on TCNQR x and DCNQIR x , respectively. Summarizing the results of these studies, we successfully obtained a linear relationship that could be used to predict charge/electron transfer in systems with different D/A combinations from an ionization plot of Δ E H–L (DA) against Δ E 1/2 (DA), where Δ E H–L (DA) is the energy gap between the HOMO level of the [Ru 2 II,II ] unit and the LUMO level of the TCNQR x /DCNQIR x unit conventionally estimated by DFT studies, and Δ E 1/2 (DA) is the difference between the first redox potentials of the [Ru 2 II,II ] and TCNQR x /DCNQIR x units.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accompanying this freezing of χ ′, a χ ′′ peak was also observed, in which the initial rise of χ ′′ was observed at 82 K on cooling, giving a phase transition temperature ( T C ) 13. This T C value is relatively high compared to those for previously reported molecule‐based magnets 4b,d,eg,m. 13 Furthermore, the long‐range ordering enabled a spontaneous magnetization, that is, ferrimagnetic ordering, because of the insertion of the intercalating paramagnetic [FeCp* 2 ] + species between the layers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%