Doping control analysis of four JWH‐250 metabolites in equine urine by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

Abstract

JWH-250 is a synthetic cannabinoid. Its use is prohibited in equine sport according to the Association of Racing Commissioners International (ARCI) and the Fédération Équestre Internationale (FEI). A doping control method to confirm the presence of four JWH-250 metabolites (JWH-250 4-OH-pentyl, JWH-250 5-OH-pentyl, JWH-250 5-OH-indole, and JWH-250 N-pentanoic acid) in equine urine was developed and validated. Urine samples were treated with acetonitrile and evaporated to concentrate the analytes prior to the analysis by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The chromatographic separation was carried out using a Phenomenex Lux ® 3 μm AMP column (150 x 3.0 mm). A triple quadrupole mass spectrometer was used for detection of the analytes in positive mode electrospray ionization using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). The limits of detection, quantification, and confirmation for these metabolites were 25, 50, and 50 pg/mL, respectively. The linear dynamic range of quantification was 50-10000 pg/mL. Enzymatic hydrolysis indicated that JWH-250 4-OH-pentyl, JWH-250 5-OH-pentyl, and JWH-250 5-OH indole are highly conjugated whereas JWH-250 N-pentanoic acidis not conjugated. Relative retention time and product ion intensity ratios were employed as the criteria to confirm the presence of these metabolites in equine urine.The method was successfully applied to post-race urine samples collected from horses suspected of being exposed to JWH-250. All four JWH-250 metabolites were confirmed in these samples, demonstrating the method applicability for equine doping control analysis. KEYWORDSDoping control analysis, Equine urine, JWH-250 metabolites, LC-MS/MS

Pharmacokinetic modelling of orally administered cannabidiol and implications for medication control in horses

“…The detection of synthetic cannabinoids in the context of doping control in horses has been described. There are, however, no further reports for detection times of CBD ( 36 , 37 , 39 ).…”