Doping control analysis of 46 polar drugs in horse plasma and urine using a ‘dilute-and-shoot’ ultra high performance liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry approach

The artificial increase of the physical capability of horses using drugs is well known in racing and other equine sports. Both illicit and therapeutic substances are regarded as prohibited substances in competition in most countries. Some countries make distinctions for a few, specific drugs which are, however, allowed for use in other countries. The primary objective in the case of doping control is the detection of any trace of drug exposure, either parent drug or any of its metabolites, using the most powerful analytical methods which are generally based on chromatographic/mass spectrometric techniques. Of major concern in horseracing is the absence of a single organization regulating the anti-doping framework; instead of this, individual racing authorities provide rules and regulations often resulting in variations in the applied doping control programmes of different countries. The aim of this paper is to review the recent literature (approximately from 2012 to mid-2016) to highlight the numerous and diverse challenges faced in doping control of racing and equestrian sports, including the detection of designer drugs (anabolic steroids or stimulants) and of other emerging prohibited substances, such as peptides and noble gases in horse urine and plasma. Moreover, the application of 'omics' techniques (especially of metabolomics) deserves attention for establishing possible fingerprints of drug abuse as well as the evolution of instrumental analysis resulting a powerful ally in the fight against doping in equine sports.

Section: --mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, few dilute-and-shoot methods have been established for the initial screening tests in equine urine. [100,101] This is attributed to…”

Section: Horse Urine Samplesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[100] Besides, dilution of the sample is essential in order to minimize the significant matrix effect.…”

Section: Horse Urine Samplesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Horse Plasma Samplesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Mass Spectrometric Techniques In the Equine Doping Controlmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Challenges in detecting substances for equine anti‐doping

Fragkaki

Kioukia‐Fougia

Kiousi

et al. 2017

A high‐throughput and broad‐spectrum screening method for analysing over 120 drugs in horse urine using liquid chromatography–high‐resolution mass spectrometry

Wong

Chan

Choi

et al. 2020

Self Cite

A high‐throughput method has been developed for the doping control analysis of 124 drug targets, processing up to 154 horse urine samples in as short as 4.5 h, from the time the samples arrive at the laboratory to the reporting deadline of 30 min before the first race, including sample receipt and registration, preparation and instrument analysis and data vetting time. Sample preparation involves a brief enzyme hydrolysis step (30 min) to detect both free and glucuronide‐conjugated drug targets. This is followed by extraction using solid‐supported liquid extraction (SLE) and analysis using liquid chromatography–high‐resolution mass spectrometry (LC–HRMS). The entire set‐up comprised of four sets of Biotage Extrahera automation systems for conducting SLE and five to six sets of Orbitrap for instrumental screening using LC–HRMS. Suspicious samples flagged were subject to confirmatory analyses using liquid chromatography–triple quadrupole mass spectrometry. The method comprises 124 drug targets from a spectrum of 41 drug classes covering acidic, basic and neutral drugs. More than 85% of the targets had limits of detection at or below 5 ng/mL in horse urine, with the lowest at 0.02 ng/mL. The method was validated for qualitative identification, including specificity, sensitivity, extraction recovery and precision. Method applicability was demonstrated by the successful detection of different drugs, namely (a) butorphanol, (b) dexamethasone, (c) diclofenac, (d) flunixin and (e) phenylbutazone, in post‐race or out‐of‐competition urine samples collected from racehorses. This method was developed for pre‐race urine testing in Hong Kong; however, it is also suitable for testing post‐race or out‐of‐competition urine samples, especially when a quick total analysis time is desired.

Application of a non‐target variable data independent workflow (vDIA) for the screening of prohibited substances in doping control testing

Leung

Wong

Zhou

et al. 2020

Self Cite

A non-target variable Data Independent Acquisition (vDIA) workflow based on accurate mass measurements using a Q Exactive OrbiTrap is presented for the first time for equine doping control testing. The vDIA workflow uses a combination of MS1 events (1 to 2) and multiple vDIA events to cover the analytes of interest. The workflow basically captures a digital image of a sample allowing all relevant MS1 and MS2 data to be recorded. In theory, the workflow can accommodate an unlimited number of analytes as long as they are amenable to the sample extraction protocol and fall within the mass limits of the workflow. Additional targets fulfilling the above requirements can be added without changing any settings. The performance of the vDIA workflow was illustrated by applying it to two screening methods in horse urine, with one workflow covering 331 basic drugs and the other covering 45 quaternary ammonium drugs (QADs). Both screening methods have good detection sensitivity with 84% of the basic drugs having Limits of Detection (LoDs) of ≤ 1 ng/mL and 84% of the QADs having LoDs of ≤ 0.4 ng/mL. Other method characteristics including retention reproducibility, method precision and false hit rate will also be presented.