Finite temperature quantum Monte Carlo simulations are performed on the anisotropic t − J model and in particular on its Ising limit. Straight site-centered stripes are imposed by an onsite potential representing external mechanisms of stripe formation. In this model, we show that, even though charge inhomogeneity exists at a high temperature, the anti-phase ordering of the spin domains between stripes occurs at a much lower temperature. The magnetic correlations at this spin ordering crossover are analyzed. The stripes show metallicity, with absence of hole attraction. Comparison between this model and others that have been proposed to explain or describe stripes, as well as possible relations with experimental features on underdoped cuprates are discussed. : 71.10.Fd, The nature of the underdoped region and of the pairing mechanism in high-T c cuprates is still a matter of strong controversies. From the experimental point of view, the relationship between the pseudogap (PG) and the superconducting gap (SG) is still under intense discussion. Older data suggested a pseudogap smoothly connecting with the superconducting gap 1 while some more recent studies 2,3 emphasize a different origin and behavior of the PG and the SG, the PG ending inside the superconducting phase at a "quantum critical point".
PACS4 From the theoretical point of view, the stripe scenario, which is an almost unavoidable consequence of neutron experiments results on La 2−x Sr x CuO 4 5,6 and perhaps on YBa 2 Cu 3 O 6+δ 7 , offers a natural explanation for PG. Consistently with the experimental controversy about the nature of PG, there are widely diverging views about the origin of stripes and its relationship with superconductivity. In the theory by Emery, Kivelson and coworkers 8 , the pseudogap is identified with the SG and stripes are a key ingredient to explain superconductivity in the cuprates. In another view, 9 stripes are regarded as competing with a uniform gas of hole pairs and hence with superconductivity. In yet another approaches, the stripes exclude hole pairing.10 There are even more important differences regarding the origin of stripes. In Ref. 8, charge inhomogeneity appears as a combined effect of phase separation and long-range Coulomb repulsion and the stripe phase can be thought as a Wigner crystal. According to White and Scalapino 9 , stripes are already present in the simple t − J model at physical values of the parameters. In Ref. 10, the driving mechanism is the formation of strong singlets across a hole. In this sense, the stripes may be regarded as domain walls.
11On the other hand, in some other views, the stripes are not inherent to two-dimensional (2D) extended t − J models but are due to, for example, electron-phonon coupling.12,13 Following these alternative views, in this paper we formulate a model assuming that the origin of stripes in the cuprates is non-intrinsic to the 2D electronic correlations and our main goal is to examine the physically relevant properties of such model.It is also well known the diffi...