2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-4332(01)00500-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dopant profile measurements in ion implanted 6H–SiC by scanning capacitance microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various methods have been proposed for the cross-section dopant profiling of implanted SiC such Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) employing a through-the-lens (ExB) detector [2,3], Scanning Spreading Resistance Microscopy (SSRM) [4], Scanning Capacitance Microscopy (SCM) [5] or a combination of them [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods have been proposed for the cross-section dopant profiling of implanted SiC such Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) employing a through-the-lens (ExB) detector [2,3], Scanning Spreading Resistance Microscopy (SSRM) [4], Scanning Capacitance Microscopy (SCM) [5] or a combination of them [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scanning probe microscopy (SPM) methodologies, such as scanning spreading resistance microscopy (SSRM) 12 and scanning capacitance microscopy (SCM), 13 which are sensitive to local charges and offer the needed resolution, have been exploited to study narrow bandgap semiconductors such as Si, SiGe, InP, GaAs, etc., where conventional adhesive Ag or Ga-In eutectic offer an acceptable low resistance back contact. 14 They have also been explored on wideband gap SiC [15][16][17][18][19][20] with fabricated back contacts. Early assessment of SSRM/ SCM techniques for (Al, Ga, In)N alloys done by Oliver et al suggests that the main challenges are the surface charging effects and high resistivity requiring application of a high DC and AC bias for a detectable SCM signal, casting doubt at the reliability and repeatability of such kind of measurements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%