1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.70031088.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dopaminergic Regulation of Striatal Acetylcholine Release: The Critical Role of Acetylcholinesterase Inhibition

Abstract: This study examined the effects of different levels of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibition on dopaminergic regulation of striatal acetylcholine (ACh) release as estimated by in vivo brain microdialysis. Systemic administration of d‐amphetamine (2 or 10 mg/kg) increased the striatal output of ACh when the AChE inhibitor neostigmine (0.1 µM) was present in the perfusion fluid. In contrast, when the same experiments were conducted at 0.01 µM neostigmine, d‐amphetamine failed to affect (2 mg/kg) or significantl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, recalculation of these data as percent changes from basal release shows that apparent changes in the release of either ACh or DA are, in fact, independent from neostigmine concentrations in the perfusion fluid (see for example Di Chiara et al, 1996;Acquas and Di Chiara, 1999). These conclusions are also consistent with those of Acquas and Fibiger (1998), which showed that DA regulation of striatal ACh release is independent from neostigmine concentrations when data are expressed as percent values of basal release. That said, in order to avoid these methodological issues and potential confounding variables, there is a growing body of evidence supporting the rationale for the use of new sensitive analytical methods for the detection of ACh and choline without the use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in the perfusion medium (see for example Hows et al, 2002;Ichikawa et al, 2000Ichikawa et al, , 2002.…”
Section: Electrochemical Detection Of Extracellular Ach and Monoaminesupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Thus, recalculation of these data as percent changes from basal release shows that apparent changes in the release of either ACh or DA are, in fact, independent from neostigmine concentrations in the perfusion fluid (see for example Di Chiara et al, 1996;Acquas and Di Chiara, 1999). These conclusions are also consistent with those of Acquas and Fibiger (1998), which showed that DA regulation of striatal ACh release is independent from neostigmine concentrations when data are expressed as percent values of basal release. That said, in order to avoid these methodological issues and potential confounding variables, there is a growing body of evidence supporting the rationale for the use of new sensitive analytical methods for the detection of ACh and choline without the use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in the perfusion medium (see for example Hows et al, 2002;Ichikawa et al, 2000Ichikawa et al, , 2002.…”
Section: Electrochemical Detection Of Extracellular Ach and Monoaminesupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Previous microdialysis studies have clearly shown that the stimulatory effect of D1 receptor agonists on ACh efflux in the striatum is independent of the concentration of the cholinesterase inhibitor neostigmine, which is commonly added to the perfusion solution to elevate basal ACh efflux (DeBoer and Abercrombie 1996; Acquas and Fibiger 1998). On the other hand, the concentration of neostigmine does affect the tonic regulation of ACh outflow in the striatum through D1 receptors (DeBoer and Abercrombie 1996; Acquas and Di Chiara 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One fundamental problem with these methods is that the inclusion of AChE inhibitors leads to changes in the physiology of the system being investigated. For example, De Boer et al [28] and Acquas and Fibiger [29] reported that perfusion fluid containing neostigmine quantitatively and qualitatively influenced the manner in which dopaminergic agents regulated ACh overflow in the striatum. Furthermore, AChE inhibitors contained in the perfusion fluid could mask, or indeed exaggerate, small drug-related changes in ACh levels as well as alter transmission of other systems within the perfused area [30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%