2013
DOI: 10.1038/nn.3364
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dopamine restores reward prediction errors in old age

Abstract: Senescence affects the ability to utilize information about the likelihood of rewards for optimal decision-making. In a human functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, we show that healthy older adults have an abnormal signature of expected value resulting in an incomplete reward prediction error signal in the nucleus accumbens, a brain region receiving rich input projections from substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area (SN/VTA) dopaminergic neurons. Structural connectivity between SN/VTA and striatu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

28
227
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 254 publications
(258 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(74 reference statements)
28
227
3
Order By: Relevance
“…such learning deficits could have been caused by disruptions of striatal reward-and reinforcement learning processes. Moreover, the degree of rightward-directed hemispatial learning bias was associated with both increased reward processing in the ventral striatum, known to be modulated by DA (Knutson and Gibbs, 2007;van der Vegt et al, 2013), and relatively better neural encoding of PEs in the contralateral left ventral striatum, which is consistent with pharmacological studies showing that the neural encoding of PEs in the ventral striatum is influenced by the level of DA function (Chowdhury et al, 2013;Jocham et al, 2011;Pessiglione et al, 2006). This reasoning may also provide an alternative explanation for the results of a recent study by Palminteri et al (2013), in which unilateral increases in DA function, achieved through deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (DBS-STN), enhanced reward learning for stimuli presented in the hemifield contralateral (vs. ipsilateral) to the stimulated hemisphere.…”
Section: Biased Neural Reinforcement Learning Relates To Spatial Learsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…such learning deficits could have been caused by disruptions of striatal reward-and reinforcement learning processes. Moreover, the degree of rightward-directed hemispatial learning bias was associated with both increased reward processing in the ventral striatum, known to be modulated by DA (Knutson and Gibbs, 2007;van der Vegt et al, 2013), and relatively better neural encoding of PEs in the contralateral left ventral striatum, which is consistent with pharmacological studies showing that the neural encoding of PEs in the ventral striatum is influenced by the level of DA function (Chowdhury et al, 2013;Jocham et al, 2011;Pessiglione et al, 2006). This reasoning may also provide an alternative explanation for the results of a recent study by Palminteri et al (2013), in which unilateral increases in DA function, achieved through deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (DBS-STN), enhanced reward learning for stimuli presented in the hemifield contralateral (vs. ipsilateral) to the stimulated hemisphere.…”
Section: Biased Neural Reinforcement Learning Relates To Spatial Learsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Because DA levels directly influence the neural encoding of prediction errors (PEs), i.e. the mismatch between actual and predicted outcomes (Chowdhury et al, 2013;Jocham et al, 2011;Pessiglione et al, 2006;Sutton and Barto, 1998) in the striatum (Abler et al, 2006;O'Doherty et al, 2003), here we hypothesized that hemispheric asymmetries in DA function could be associated with hemispheric asymmetries in the neural encoding of PEs. In particular, a relative increase of DA function in one hemisphere would lead to better encoding of PEs related to stimuli presented in the contralateral (vs. ipsilateral) hemispace, and thus also result in hemispatial learning biases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, we predicted that pharmacological agents that boost systemic DA, such as amphetamine (AMPH), would restore deficient signal variability levels in older adults. Extant studies have examined the effect of DA agonists on average blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal responses and cognition (13,21,22); however, the effects of DA agonists on BOLD signal variability and cognition, and the moderation of these effects by adult age, have not been investigated thus far.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in the synaptic/extracellular content of dopamine [22], or alterations of the dopamine receptorcoupled signal transduction mechanisms [23,24] evoke disturbances in mood [25], learning and memory [26] and processing of reward signals [16]. Dysfunction of the VTA-PFC unit has been implicated in the pathology of schizophrenia [27], bipolar disorder [28,29] attention deficit hyperactivity disorder [30], and in the development of drug addiction [31]. It is noteworthy that effective medication of psychotic diseases partly relies on the selective targeting of dopaminergic neurotransmission [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the manifest psychotic diseases, an altered, deteriorating dopamine signaling characterizes the aging female brain [29,[33][34][35]. Obvious signs of decline in PFC-associated cognitive functions appear during perimenopause [18] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%