2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dopamine receptor and transporter levels are altered in the brain of Purkinje Cell Degeneration mutant mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
2
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that ␤-adrenoceptors exert an excitatory action on hippocampus pyramidal neurons (Curet and de Montigny, 1988b), it is possible that the net biological response to DA results from opposite effects exerted on various adrenoceptors. In keeping with a weak expression of DA receptors and raclopride binding sites in the dorsal hippocampus (Dubois et al, 1986;Delis et al, 2004), it was reported that neither the iontophoretic application of raclopride nor the systemic injection of haloperidol blocked DA-or NE-induced inhibition in the dorsal hippocampus. Although haloperidol is known to bind and antagonize both D 2 and ␣ 1 -receptors (Cohen and Lipinski, 1986), the possibility that it blocked the adrenoceptors in the present study can be excluded, because the administration of the selective ␣ 1 -adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin reduced the effect of NE in a dose-dependent manner (Curet and de Montigny, 1988a) and was here devoid of antagonistic activity.…”
Section: Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given that ␤-adrenoceptors exert an excitatory action on hippocampus pyramidal neurons (Curet and de Montigny, 1988b), it is possible that the net biological response to DA results from opposite effects exerted on various adrenoceptors. In keeping with a weak expression of DA receptors and raclopride binding sites in the dorsal hippocampus (Dubois et al, 1986;Delis et al, 2004), it was reported that neither the iontophoretic application of raclopride nor the systemic injection of haloperidol blocked DA-or NE-induced inhibition in the dorsal hippocampus. Although haloperidol is known to bind and antagonize both D 2 and ␣ 1 -receptors (Cohen and Lipinski, 1986), the possibility that it blocked the adrenoceptors in the present study can be excluded, because the administration of the selective ␣ 1 -adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin reduced the effect of NE in a dose-dependent manner (Curet and de Montigny, 1988a) and was here devoid of antagonistic activity.…”
Section: Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The involvement of DAT was somewhat unexpected because in brain regions in which DAT is weakly expressed, as in the hippocampus (Delis et al, 2004;Dahlin et al, 2007), a limited role of DAT in removing DA from the extracellular space has been reported (Morón et al, 2002). An alternative mechanism could be that residual DA uptake was mediated by the recently cloned and characterized polyspecific cation-monoamine transporters organic cation transporters (2 and 3) or plasma membrane monoamine transporter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if not traditionally considered as a prominent cerebellar neuromodulator, there is evidence for dopaminergic transmission in the cerebellum (Takada et al, 1993; Hurley et al, 2003; Delis et al, 2004; Schweighofer et al, 2004; Giompres and Delis, 2005) There is also some evidence that dopamine levels in the cerebellum follow a circadian cycle (Owasoyo et al, 1979). However, the role of dopamine in the cerebellum remains poorly understood (Schweighofer et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although pharmacodynamic effects of SCH23390 acting at the D1 receptor were initially reported in rat studies (e.g., 19,31,57,64), the strain-specific effects of SCH23390 could alternatively be due to pharmacokinetics with SCH23390 acting as a poor D1 antagonist in some murine strains and a strong D1 antagonist in others. For instance, SCH23390 binding is significantly reduced in homozygous mice for the recessive gene weaver (55, but see 50), dopamine D(1A) receptor knockout mice (43,44), and diabetic mice (60), but is increased in Purkinje Cell Degeneration mutant mice (23). In contrast, SCH23390 binding is unchanged in hypoxic mice (5), MPTP-treated mice (4), methamphetamine-treated mice (77), 6-hydroxydopamine and iron-deficient mice (81), mu-opioid receptor knock-out mice (71), and cannabinoid CB1 receptor knockout mice (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%