2018
DOI: 10.2217/nmt-2017-0048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dopamine, BDNF and Motor Function Postbilateral Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Parkinson’s Disease

Abstract: Bilateral anodal tDCS is a safe stimulation protocol that leads to motor functions' improvement and BDNF serum level increase in patients with Parkinson's disease, however the findings of this feasible study are preliminary and further study is needed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanisms underlying improved retrieval of motor encoding even during untrained tasks are presently illusive. Recently, it was shown that bilateral atDCS increased brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) serum levels together with improved motor function in PD, 43 a result that was also found after intensive rehabilitation. 44 BDNF may play a role in processes that are involved in synaptic efficacy linked to neuroplasticity (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The mechanisms underlying improved retrieval of motor encoding even during untrained tasks are presently illusive. Recently, it was shown that bilateral atDCS increased brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) serum levels together with improved motor function in PD, 43 a result that was also found after intensive rehabilitation. 44 BDNF may play a role in processes that are involved in synaptic efficacy linked to neuroplasticity (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…One study tested in both off and on dopaminergic medication [ 33 ], one tested in the off state [ 49 ], and one did not report medication status [ 52 ]. Five investigations had open-label designs [ 38 , 43 , 45 , 46 , 47 ]; seven were parallel arm, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled designs [ 33 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 44 , 50 , 52 ]; and eight were crossover, randomized, sham-controlled designs, with six being double-blind [ 36 , 37 , 39 , 48 , 49 , 51 ] and two with unstated blinding [ 34 , 35 ]. The tDCS intensities ranged from 1 to 2.8 mA (range of current densities = 0.02 mA/cm 2 –0.12 mA/cm 2 ) and stimulation was applied for 7–30 min (mode = 20 min).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third study did not have any unusual stimulation parameters that might explain the reported tingling and light flash experienced by one subject and the reported event might be attributed to the individual characteristics of that subject or slightly different electrode placement in that session [ 40 ]. Lastly, although the group sizes and characteristics were not identical, the possibility of at least some of the subjects being included in all three of the Hadoush et al papers is noted [ 45 , 46 , 47 ], and the results of Grüner et al [ 34 ] and Eggers et al [ 35 ] were explicitly stated to be from the same subjects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to recent molecular studies, direct current stimulation produces significant changes in neurotrophic factors, especially on brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Thus, variations in BDNF secretion correlated to recovery after direct stimulation in preoperative treatment of pain control and Parkinson's disease ( 27 , 28 ). Similarly, elevated nerve growth factor (NGF) serum levels in patients with depression have been suggested as adaptive neuroplasticity and associated with cognitive improvement after direct current stimulation ( 29 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%