2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11024-013-9238-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doomed to be Entrepreneurial: Institutional Transformation or Institutional Lock-Ins of ‘New’ Universities?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
55
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Collective wisdom is taken to be summarized in research rankings based on publications and citations (Laband 2013). Second, research rankings fuel competition among scholars, lead to more and better research, and promote what is called an ''entrepreneurial university'' (Clark 1998;Stensaker and Benner 2013). Third, research rankings give the public a transparent picture of scholarly activity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collective wisdom is taken to be summarized in research rankings based on publications and citations (Laband 2013). Second, research rankings fuel competition among scholars, lead to more and better research, and promote what is called an ''entrepreneurial university'' (Clark 1998;Stensaker and Benner 2013). Third, research rankings give the public a transparent picture of scholarly activity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As changes have unfolded inside the university in different parts of the world, the concept of entrepreneurialism-despite its many potential meanings-has become a much used reference and point of departure to describe the different facets and forms of transformation taking place in the university (see, e.g. Kr€ ucken and Meier, 2006;Deem et al, 2007;Stensaker and Benner, 2013).…”
Section: Clark's Distinctive Organisational Focus Intersects a Largermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the increasing need to focus on both public and private public dimensions, this strategy may not be so much a choice but a necessity due to increasing dependence of external and competitive funding sources (Clark 2004;Stensaker and Benner 2013). Universities pursuing this strategy might, for example, find ways to leverage outreach or public engagement activities to service both their public mission and generate additional revenues in a new unit that fuses public engagement and private entrepreneurship.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greater emphasis on private rather than public goods and benefits can be found in the texts and images that public universities use to communicate about themselves (Morphew and Hartley 2006;Saichaie and Morphew 2014). In Europe, governance reforms have also occurred and existing research analyzing how universities have chosen to exercise their independence indicates that it is possible to identify a more ´managerial´ university emerging through stronger internal hierarchical governance and more time and energy devoted to handling external accountability claims and strengthen their external profile (File et al 2006;Fumasoli and Lepori 2011;Frølich et al 2013, Stensaker andBenner 2013;Stensaker et al 2014;Fumasoli et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%