2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2021.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DONS: Dynamic Optimized Neighbor Selection for smart blockchain networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The trade-off between scalability and security in sharded public BCs is an open optimization problem [101]. The utilization of a TTP further deviates the system towards centralization, while the utilization of a leader election raises identity privacy concerns [85]. Decentralization and Privacy were among the few core issues that Bitcoin primarily attempted to solve.…”
Section: Experiments and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The trade-off between scalability and security in sharded public BCs is an open optimization problem [101]. The utilization of a TTP further deviates the system towards centralization, while the utilization of a leader election raises identity privacy concerns [85]. Decentralization and Privacy were among the few core issues that Bitcoin primarily attempted to solve.…”
Section: Experiments and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is hard to address, once addressed in public permissionless BCs either privacy violations, or very high complexities are usually expected [85]. Even if agreed-on to be used, incentivization mechanisms need to be implemented, and high complexity issues must be solved.…”
Section: Decentralizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, research consideration should be given to multiple controllers to help the network scale up. Baniata et al [84] used a hybrid architecture to manage the P2P network of blockchain, as shown in Figure 8. One peer is voted into a leadership role to take charge of topology management.…”
Section: P2p Topology Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this approach has significant network management overhead and does not easily lend itself to a dynamic reconfiguration. Therefore, to make P2P management more flexible and minimize its management overhead, researchers could consider developing intelligent semi-distributed techniques [84] to manage the P2P of blockchain networks. Thus, some peers in the blockchain are assigned special responsibilities.…”
Section: Gap Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is another approach that uses a minimum spanning tree (MST) for the neighbor selection [33]. In that method, a leader node in a blockchain network creates an MST in the network by taking all the network edge costs into consideration.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%