2007
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-02-072470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Donor lymphocyte infusions for the treatment of minimal residual disease in acute leukemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Repeated observations indeed suggested an anti-leukemia effect of such an approach, at least if used at very-low tumor burden. [82][83][84] Bader et al 69 initially reported in a prospective study that, among 46 ALL patients with increasing mixed chimerisms after AlloHCT, the 31 subjected to immunotherapy (withdrawal of immunosuppression and/or low-dose donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI)) had a significantly better 3-year EFS than the 15 who did not receive immunotherapy (37% vs 0%, Po0.001). A follow-up study from the same group confirmed these findings by documenting a probability of EFS of 46% vs 0% for patients with mixed chimerisms receiving (n ¼ 13) vs not receiving (n ¼ 7) immunotherapy, with an EFS estimate of 71% for the subset of patients transplanted while in CR.…”
Section: Using Pre-hct Mrd To Tailor Therapy In Acute Leukemiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repeated observations indeed suggested an anti-leukemia effect of such an approach, at least if used at very-low tumor burden. [82][83][84] Bader et al 69 initially reported in a prospective study that, among 46 ALL patients with increasing mixed chimerisms after AlloHCT, the 31 subjected to immunotherapy (withdrawal of immunosuppression and/or low-dose donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI)) had a significantly better 3-year EFS than the 15 who did not receive immunotherapy (37% vs 0%, Po0.001). A follow-up study from the same group confirmed these findings by documenting a probability of EFS of 46% vs 0% for patients with mixed chimerisms receiving (n ¼ 13) vs not receiving (n ¼ 7) immunotherapy, with an EFS estimate of 71% for the subset of patients transplanted while in CR.…”
Section: Using Pre-hct Mrd To Tailor Therapy In Acute Leukemiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, there is interest in the administration of prophylactic DLI in patients deemed to be at a higher risk of relapse as a strategy to optimize the GVL effect post transplant. 88 The presence of mixed T-cell chimerism after a reduced-intensity allograft is taken to indicate bidirectional tolerance and it can be argued that DLI should be administered in these patients in the first few months post transplant with the aim of achieving full donor T-cell chimerism. 89 Other groups have explored the possibility of restricting the use of DLI to patients who demonstrate MRD positivity post transplant.…”
Section: Strategies To Improve Outcome After Ric Allograftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first option is the reinforcement of the GVL effect by immunosuppression reduction or donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI); the second is the application of further cytoreductive therapy, including MoAb or specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors, in the case of BCR/ABL-positive ALL. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] The benefit from such therapy has been described in a small proportion of ALL patients. To date, there is no general consent regarding the choice and timing of therapy in case of post transplant MRD positivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%