2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2011.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Donor human leukocyte antigen specific antibodies predict development and define prognosis in transplant glomerulopathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of graft failure in patients without DSAs, with DSAs directed against a single UCB unit (n ϭ 11), or with DSAs directed against both UCB units (n ϭ 7) was 5.5%, 18.2%, and 57.1%, respectively (Cochran-Armitage trend test, P ϭ .0001; Figure 1). Individual odds ratios (ORs) for graft failure comparing patients with DSAs against one UCB unit, DSAs against one or both UCB units, or DSAs against both UCB units to patients without DSAs were 3.85 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56%-26.4%; P ϭ .19), 8.67 (95% CI, 1.89%-39.68%; P ϭ .0055), and 23.1 (95% CI, 3.5%-153.9%; P ϭ .002), respectively. These statistical associations were maintained when patients who underwent reduced intensity conditioning (n ϭ 53) were examined.…”
Section: Graft Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The incidence of graft failure in patients without DSAs, with DSAs directed against a single UCB unit (n ϭ 11), or with DSAs directed against both UCB units (n ϭ 7) was 5.5%, 18.2%, and 57.1%, respectively (Cochran-Armitage trend test, P ϭ .0001; Figure 1). Individual odds ratios (ORs) for graft failure comparing patients with DSAs against one UCB unit, DSAs against one or both UCB units, or DSAs against both UCB units to patients without DSAs were 3.85 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56%-26.4%; P ϭ .19), 8.67 (95% CI, 1.89%-39.68%; P ϭ .0055), and 23.1 (95% CI, 3.5%-153.9%; P ϭ .002), respectively. These statistical associations were maintained when patients who underwent reduced intensity conditioning (n ϭ 53) were examined.…”
Section: Graft Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 In solid organ transplantation, where crossing HLA barriers is routine, anti-HLA antibodies are linked to organ rejection and inferior outcomes. 8,9 In hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, more limited data exist on the significance of these antibodies. Spellman et al, in a retrospective case-control study, demonstrated that the prevalence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) was higher in a group of mismatched unrelated donor recipients who suffered graft rejection than in a control group that engrafted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TG develops as a consequence of overt and covert episodes of antibody-mediated rejection (5,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24), typically, due to HLA class II anti-HLA antibodies (5,10,(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). Antibodies against HLA develop when antibody-accessible polymorphic residues on HLA antigens are recognized as ''nonself.''…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of high levels of class I and/or II DSA (i.e. anti-HLA antibodies with reactivity against the potential donor leading to positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity [CDC] cross-match) is associated with poorer graft outcomes, including the development of acute and chronic AMR, transplant glomerulopathy and late graft loss (Eng, Bennett et al 2008;Gloor, Winters et al 2010;Eng, Bennett et al 2011;Mujtaba, Goggins et al 2011). A study by LeFaucheur et al demonstrated that the presence of DSA significantly reduces graft survival rates compared to recipients without DSA (1 year graft survival -81% and 94% respectively and 8 years graft survival 47% and 78% respectively) (Lefaucheur, Suberbielle-Boissel et al 2008) ( Table 2).…”
Section: Desensitization Of Highly-sensitized Patients For Live-donormentioning
confidence: 99%