2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2020.109074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Donor group influence on dye-sensitized solar cell device performances: Balancing dye loading and donor size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 23 ] Therefore, further engineering of dye molecules, i.e., the length of alkoxy chains should be carefully tailored to optimize dye‐loading and molecular aggregation. [ 24 ] In addition, the stability and loading amount of adsorbed dye may be improved by either using 2‐carboxypyridine as the anchoring group or increasing the number of light‐harvesting units by employing two anchors to the dye molecules, thus improving the photocurrent and PCE. [ 25 ] As for photovoltaic parameters extracted from photocurrent‐voltage ( J–V ) curves, V OC of CXC12 ‐based DSSCs reaches 1.12 V under AM 1.5G illumination, which is higher than CXC22 ‐based ones of 1.06 V, indicating that CXC12 has better capability for preventing charge recombination.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 23 ] Therefore, further engineering of dye molecules, i.e., the length of alkoxy chains should be carefully tailored to optimize dye‐loading and molecular aggregation. [ 24 ] In addition, the stability and loading amount of adsorbed dye may be improved by either using 2‐carboxypyridine as the anchoring group or increasing the number of light‐harvesting units by employing two anchors to the dye molecules, thus improving the photocurrent and PCE. [ 25 ] As for photovoltaic parameters extracted from photocurrent‐voltage ( J–V ) curves, V OC of CXC12 ‐based DSSCs reaches 1.12 V under AM 1.5G illumination, which is higher than CXC22 ‐based ones of 1.06 V, indicating that CXC12 has better capability for preventing charge recombination.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each selected dye orbital energy is measured through the same cyclic voltammetry procedure in DCM, leading to the same electrochemical approximations for orbital energies. 40–42,44,56–58,61 This consistency allows the computed orbital energies to be empirically corrected through a LSF once again. Furthermore, all three methods overestimate the LUMO energies.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the LUMO score has the highest average score of the three parameters at 65. Specifically, benchmark dyes that scored a 100 for the LUMO are NL4, 58 ND2, 57 AP17, 41 and AP16. 41 The charge transfer average score resides in the middle of the two parameters and is 48.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…18,20,27 Our group also worked on the effect of additional electronwithdrawing/electron-donating groups at different positions of a selected dye sensitizer. 19,36 Such modifications showed an effective change in the efficiency of several metal-free dye sensitizers as revealed by us as well as different researchers over the ages based on the considerable changes of donors, 26,27,[37][38][39][40][41] spacers [42][43][44][45][46][47] and acceptors. [48][49][50][51][52][53][54] To further increase the efficiency, researchers have been working on the effect of the dual nature of the different components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%