2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(99)00205-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Donor finger morbidity in cross-finger flaps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10,12-16 A cross-finger flap provides a straightforward and reliable method for soft tissue coverage of an amputated fingertip, but it needs two stages to complete the reconstructive procedure and may cause additional donor site morbidity, including cold intolerance and stiffness of the donor finger. 17 Microvascular-free tissue transfer provides an alternative for finger reconstruction, but it requires prolonged surgery and advanced microsurgical techniques such as A-V shunting and chemical leeching. 18,19 The successful use of a composite graft to reconstruct the fingertips has been demonstrated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,12-16 A cross-finger flap provides a straightforward and reliable method for soft tissue coverage of an amputated fingertip, but it needs two stages to complete the reconstructive procedure and may cause additional donor site morbidity, including cold intolerance and stiffness of the donor finger. 17 Microvascular-free tissue transfer provides an alternative for finger reconstruction, but it requires prolonged surgery and advanced microsurgical techniques such as A-V shunting and chemical leeching. 18,19 The successful use of a composite graft to reconstruct the fingertips has been demonstrated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensory restoration of the direct flap was measured using the static 2-point discrimination (2PD) test [10] and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (SWM) test [11]. We evaluated colour matching of the skin graft in the donor defect that was classified as normal, hypo-pigmented and hyper-pigmented [12].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, this technique avoids the significant morbidity such as joint stiffness associated with the use of flaps from uninjured adjacent digits. 13 It can be used when adjacent fingers have significant injuries (like in case no. 2), and immobilization or a second operation for pedicle division is not required like with the cross-finger flap.…”
Section: Annals Of Plastic Surgery • Volume 53 Number 2 August 2004mentioning
confidence: 99%