2018
DOI: 10.1111/jopp.12154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Donation without Domination: Private Charity and Republican Liberty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorists who promote competition as a means of minimizing domination in labor markets, such as Robert Taylor, view that domination as a consequence of insufficiently competitive market conditions and insufficiently resourced exit rights. As Taylor (2018, 445) puts it,competitive markets in general protect the [freedom as nondomination] of their participants by eliminating economic power; they create a structural context within which their constitutive relationships can be free of domination, thereby advancing republican ideals.…”
Section: The Reasonable Alternative Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorists who promote competition as a means of minimizing domination in labor markets, such as Robert Taylor, view that domination as a consequence of insufficiently competitive market conditions and insufficiently resourced exit rights. As Taylor (2018, 445) puts it,competitive markets in general protect the [freedom as nondomination] of their participants by eliminating economic power; they create a structural context within which their constitutive relationships can be free of domination, thereby advancing republican ideals.…”
Section: The Reasonable Alternative Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… See, for example, Taylor (2018), who argues that a generous voucher system enabling individuals to purchase key services from competing private providers would best protect poorer claimants against domination. This clearly conflicts with any recognisably ESM as in fact appealed to in debates around the EU and social policy. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%