2016
DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2016.1220070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Donation via Mobile Applications: A Study of the Factors Affecting Mobile Donation Application Use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other facets of civic engagement—namely political efficacy and an interest in public affairs—have been found to be positively associated with self-efficacy [ 34 ]. Furthermore, research on mobile donation as a new platform for technology-mediated civic engagement has demonstrated that perceived effectiveness (i.e., the degree to which consumers believe that the company will really donate as much as promised and that this donation will actually reach the needy recipients) has a positive effect on the intention to donate via mobile phone [ 35 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other facets of civic engagement—namely political efficacy and an interest in public affairs—have been found to be positively associated with self-efficacy [ 34 ]. Furthermore, research on mobile donation as a new platform for technology-mediated civic engagement has demonstrated that perceived effectiveness (i.e., the degree to which consumers believe that the company will really donate as much as promised and that this donation will actually reach the needy recipients) has a positive effect on the intention to donate via mobile phone [ 35 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other types of promoters that got lesser attention from the literature are the members of professional circles such as teachers (Meer 2014(Meer , 2017Pak and Wash 2017;Althoff and Leskovec 2015;Wash 2013) or artists in the music industry (Ordanini et al 2011); research units (Byrnes et al 2014;Perlstein 2013); or hybrid arrangements as is the case with those campaigns promoted by the patients' advocates (Dragojlovic and Lynd 2014) or resulting from the collaboration among businesses and charities through causerelated marketing activities (Choi and Kim 2016).…”
Section: Who: the Actors Of Dcf For Charitable Causesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the online channel(s) employed to foster, promote, and spread DCF campaigns for charitable causes, enablers mainly relate to: (1) the choice of channels and (2) the channel strategies. The most prevalent channels in the literature are social media (Bergamini et al 2017;Berliner and Kenworthy 2017;Bernardino and Santos 2016;Korolov et al 2015Korolov et al , 2016Li and Wu 2016;Tan et al 2016;Lee and Hsieh 2013); SNS (Aprilia and Wibowo 2017;Bergamini et al 2017;Sura et al 2017;Zhong and Lin 2017;Castillo et al 2014;Ordanini et al 2011); DCF digital platforms (Bergamini et al 2017;Berliner and Kenworthy 2017;Flanigan 2017;Hossain and Oparaocha 2017;Kim and De Moor 2017;Bernardino and Santos 2016;Gleasure and Feller 2016b;Wang et al 2016;Yang et al 2016;Belleflamme et al 2015;Ordanini et al 2011); DCF sites (Budak and Rao 2016;Snyder et al 2016;Beaulieu and Sarker 2015;Solomon et al 2015;Pitt et al 2002); donor-to-nonprofit (D2N) online marketplaces (Ozdemir et al 2010); use of mobile devices (Choi and Kim 2016;Bellio et al 2015;Chen and Givens 2013); and text messaging (Bellio et al 2015;Chen and Givens 2013).…”
Section: Who: the Actors Of Dcf For Charitable Causesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moraru (2014) states that nonprofit organizations are adopting mobile technologies in different activities, such as administrative efficiency, SMS campaigns and innovation in fundraising activities. Choi & Kim (2016) advocate that smartphones transformed the donation activity, making them more convenient without interfering in users' daily schedules. This study found that four attributes have significant positive impacts on users' willingness to use mobile donation applications, namely; (i) typecause fit, (ii) name-cause fit, (iii) cause involvement, and (iv) perceived effectiveness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%