2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Donald Trump and the white-male dissonance machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Boy, did we get it wrong. In our previous editorial (Page and Dittmer 2016) we asserted that Trump would not win the election. Other predictionssuch as our hope that the rise and eventual fall of Trump would provide an opportunity to reconfigure the sclerotic political gridlock that has come to characterize U.S. politicsseem increasingly distant.…”
Section: Sam Page and Jason Dittmermentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Boy, did we get it wrong. In our previous editorial (Page and Dittmer 2016) we asserted that Trump would not win the election. Other predictionssuch as our hope that the rise and eventual fall of Trump would provide an opportunity to reconfigure the sclerotic political gridlock that has come to characterize U.S. politicsseem increasingly distant.…”
Section: Sam Page and Jason Dittmermentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Bleeding women! ), he positioned himself as the embodiment of white masculine resurgence, enacted what Page and Dittmer (2016) have called a "white-male dissonance machine," and blithely evaded the obvious questions: could a millionaire with a history of not paying workers save the (white) working class? In the year since, the dissonance has become only more uncanny as not only Trump but his entire family and team took the stage in epic performances of whiteness.…”
Section: Banu Gökariksel and Sara Smithmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a concern with emotion in electoral politics resonates beyond Latin America, into many spaces in America, Europe and beyond (cf. Page & Dittmer, 2016; Steinberg et al, 2018). This can be seen as part of what Dittmer (2017: 6) calls the ‘New Statecraft’, a focus ‘principally concerned with the everyday crafting of the state’.…”
Section: Ethnographiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The future of US geopolitical subjectivity relies on a past narrative that sites like the TMM respond to and seek to perpetuate in certain ways. Such sites are made perhaps even more “real” in the current geopolitical climate, whereby fear of an enemy bent on US destruction lurks in every corner (see Gökarıksel & Smith, ; Ingram, ; Page & Dittmer, ). In the following section, we explore the theoretical resources necessary for grasping the embodied geopolitics of negative simulation.…”
Section: Titan Missile Museum In Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%