2017
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Don’t Lose Your Brain at Work – The Role of Recurrent Novelty at Work in Cognitive and Brain Aging

Abstract: Cognitive and brain aging is strongly influenced by everyday settings such as work demands. Long-term exposure to low job complexity, for instance, has detrimental effects on cognitive functioning and regional gray matter (GM) volume. Brain and cognition, however, are also characterized by plasticity. We postulate that the experience of novelty (at work) is one important trigger of plasticity. We investigated the cumulative effect of recurrent exposure to work-task changes (WTC) at low levels of job complexity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
49
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
6
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be due, on the one hand, to the existence of a wide range of occupational conditions that have been categorized as white-collar or blue-collar, and diverse factors within these categories could affect the relationships between antecedent or subsequent correlates and ER. Recent studies showed that long-term exposure to low job complexity, i. e.: industrial production work has detrimental effects on cognitive functioning and regional gray matter volume, and it would have an impact on retirement decision making (Oltmanns et al, 2017 ). As Feldman ( 2013 ) stated, workers make appraisals about how unusual it is for someone their age to still be in the workforce, but these evaluations refer to a concrete occupational field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due, on the one hand, to the existence of a wide range of occupational conditions that have been categorized as white-collar or blue-collar, and diverse factors within these categories could affect the relationships between antecedent or subsequent correlates and ER. Recent studies showed that long-term exposure to low job complexity, i. e.: industrial production work has detrimental effects on cognitive functioning and regional gray matter volume, and it would have an impact on retirement decision making (Oltmanns et al, 2017 ). As Feldman ( 2013 ) stated, workers make appraisals about how unusual it is for someone their age to still be in the workforce, but these evaluations refer to a concrete occupational field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most important, however, is the possibility that the usage and non‐usage of specific psychological and motor functions have an influence on brain size. Many previous studies have shown that specific brain parts are considerably influenced by practice and non‐use (Erickson et al., ; Jäncke, ; Münte et al., ; Oltmanns et al., ; Voelcker‐Rehage, Godde, & Staudinger, ; Voss et al., ; Zatorre, Fields, & Johansen‐Berg, ). Taken together, there are more sources of variance for the brain size metrics obtained in adulthood and during ageing than for body height, possibly mitigating brain size and body height correlations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Older adults, therefore, might be more cognitively stimulated than middle-aged adults by reading books and newspapers. Then, differences in lifestyle or living condition could lead to different relationships between reading and cognitive function [ 32 ]. However, the mechanism of the relationship between reading and cognitive function is largely unproven.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%