Dominus actuum suorum

Schermaier, Martin

doi:10.26498/zrgra-2017-0104

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The "development" of the idea could be also mapped to time slices, if we have an appropriate amount of relevant textual data in the corpus. Such hybrid investigations would provide quantifiable support for the argument that even though Roman law does not define "ownership" as such [39,40] the idea is encapsulated in ancient formulas such as "the thing is mine" (res meum esse) [41,42]. The idea may be undefined and dispersed, but it is very much present.…”

Section: Languagementioning

confidence: 99%

A Relational Database of Roman Law Based on Justinian’s <i>Digest</i>

Ribary

2020

JOHD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The data was produced as part of a three-year research project on the topic of "Computational modelling of law -Sustainable legal AI from Roman legal sources" conducted at the University of Surrey School of Law since November 2019. The project aims to create a computational model in the laboratory conditions of a historical legal system based on Justinian's corpus of Roman law (533-535 CE) and focuses on three cascading layers: (1) the compositional and conceptual structure of legal texts; (2) the network of legal concepts and axioms; and (3) the logic of legal rules. Developed functionalities will be adapted to address challenges of modern law and legal technology. The relational database of the Digest is the result of investigations at the first layer.(2) Methods Information was pulled from three types of sources: (1) the text of the Digest, (2) research papers reconstructing the Digest's compositional structure, and (3) encyclopaedia and dictionary articles, and other sources about the jurists quoted in the Digest.

show abstract

Section: Languagementioning

confidence: 99%