2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DOMINO: Using Machine Learning to Predict Genes Associated with Dominant Disorders

Abstract: In contrast to recessive conditions with biallelic inheritance, identification of dominant (monoallelic) mutations for Mendelian disorders is more difficult, because of the abundance of benign heterozygous variants that act as massive background noise (typically, in a 400:1 excess ratio). To reduce this overflow of false positives in next-generation sequencing (NGS) screens, we developed DOMINO, a tool assessing the likelihood for a gene to harbor dominant changes. Unlike commonly-used predictors of pathogenic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
89
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(31 reference statements)
3
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“… The inheritance pattern of phenotypes associated with variants in candidate epilepsy genes was determined with the DOMINO tool …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… The inheritance pattern of phenotypes associated with variants in candidate epilepsy genes was determined with the DOMINO tool …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detected translocations (figure 1) were called using a newly proposed genomic nomenclature for structural chromosomal rearrangements detected by NGS 18. The likelihood that a gene was sensitive to mutation/deregulation of a single allele was estimated using pLI score from Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC)19 and the recently proposed DOMINO score 20…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only genes exclusively associated with autosomal-dominant disorders (status "confirmed" in OMIM version 2018.5, omim.org) and with a DOMINO score ≥0.9 were selected. 13 To restrict our analyses to genes likely intolerant to loss-of-function (LOF) variants, only genes with a pLi score ≥0.9 and an "observed/expected" (o/e) metric 90% confidence interval upper bound <0.35 in gnomAD were further considered ( Figure 1). 2 Genes associated with disorders inherited in an autosomalrecessive or X-linked manner were not analyzed, because for the gnomAD dataset (r2.0.1) information on haplotype and sex is not (yet) available.…”
Section: Detection Of Pathogenic Variants In Gnomadmentioning
confidence: 99%