2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.dam.2017.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domination parameters with number 2: Interrelations and algorithmic consequences

Abstract: In this paper, we study the most basic domination invariants in graphs, in which number 2 is intrinsic part of their definitions. We classify them upon three criteria, two of which give the following previously studied invariants: the weak 2-domination number, γ w2 (G), the 2-domination number, γ 2 (G), the {2}-domination number, γ {2} (G), the double domination number, γ ×2 (G), the total {2}-domination number, γ t{2} (G), and the total double domination number, γ t×2 (G), where G is a graph in which a corres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next we derive new bounds on the double total domination number. The first result improves the bound γ ×2,t (G) ≥ γ t (G) + 1 (see [4]) whenever diam(G) ≥ 5.…”
Section: Theorem 6 the Following Statements Hold For Any Graph G Withsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Next we derive new bounds on the double total domination number. The first result improves the bound γ ×2,t (G) ≥ γ t (G) + 1 (see [4]) whenever diam(G) ≥ 5.…”
Section: Theorem 6 the Following Statements Hold For Any Graph G Withsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…We suggest the books [12,15] in case the reader is not familiar with another some basic concepts, notation and terminology of graphs. The following upper bounds for the double total domination number were established by Bermudo et al in [1] and independently by Bonomo et al in [4].…”
Section: Proposition 1 the Following Inequality Chains Hold For Any Graph G Withmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, strong inapproximability results are known for these variants of domination in the class of split graphs: for every > 0, the dominating set, the total dominating set, and the connected dominating set problem cannot be approximated to within a factor on (1 − ) ln n in the class of n-vertex split graphs, unless P = NP. Theorem 6.5 in [8] provides this result for domination and total domination, while for connected domination the same result follows from the fact that all the three problems are equivalent in any class of split graphs (see Lemma 7.2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Bonomo et al [9] obtained the following relationship between the double domination number and the 2-domination number.…”
Section: Upper Bounds On the Double Domination Numbermentioning
confidence: 95%