2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-11509-8_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dominating Induced Matching in Some Subclasses of Bipartite Graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It turns out that the above problems are polynomial-time solvable on circular convex graphs and subclasses of (t, ∆)-tree convex graphs, but NP-complete for star convex graphs and comb convex graphs. In contrast, Panda and Chaudhary [35] proved that Dominating Induced Matching is not only polynomialtime solvable on circular convex and triad convex graphs, but also on star convex graphs. Nevertheless, we notice a common pattern: many dominating set, induced matching and graph transversal type of problems are polynomial-time solvable for (t, ∆)-tree convex graphs, for every t ≥ 1 and ∆ ≥ 3, and NP-complete for comb convex graphs, and thus for (∞, 3)-tree convex graphs, and star convex graphs, or equivalently, (1, ∞)-tree convex graphs.…”
Section: Mim-widthmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It turns out that the above problems are polynomial-time solvable on circular convex graphs and subclasses of (t, ∆)-tree convex graphs, but NP-complete for star convex graphs and comb convex graphs. In contrast, Panda and Chaudhary [35] proved that Dominating Induced Matching is not only polynomialtime solvable on circular convex and triad convex graphs, but also on star convex graphs. Nevertheless, we notice a common pattern: many dominating set, induced matching and graph transversal type of problems are polynomial-time solvable for (t, ∆)-tree convex graphs, for every t ≥ 1 and ∆ ≥ 3, and NP-complete for comb convex graphs, and thus for (∞, 3)-tree convex graphs, and star convex graphs, or equivalently, (1, ∞)-tree convex graphs.…”
Section: Mim-widthmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is worth noting that this complexity dichotomy does not hold for all LCVS problems; recall that Dominating Induced Matching is polynomial-time solvable on star convex graphs [35]. Theorems 1 and 2, combined with the result of [11], imply that this problem is also polynomial-time solvable on circular convex graphs and (t, ∆)-tree convex graphs for every t ≥ 1 and ∆ ≥ 3.…”
Section: Mim-widthmentioning
confidence: 99%