2010
DOI: 10.2977/prims/6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dominated Bilinear Forms and 2-homogeneous Polynomials

Abstract: The main goal of this note is to establish a connection between the cotype of the Banach space X and the parameters r for which every 2-homogeneous polynomial on X is rdominated. Let cot X be the infimum of the cotypes assumed by X and (cot X) * be its conjugate. The main result of this note asserts that if cot X > 2, then for every 1 ≤ r < (cot X)* there exists a non-r-dominated 2-homogeneous polynomial on X.2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 46G25, 46B20, 46B28. Keywords: r-dominated multilinear form, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(15 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear that, so defined, v is continuous and closes the diagram (9). The converse follows from Proposition 4.3 and the ideal property.…”
Section: The Factorization Theoremmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is clear that, so defined, v is continuous and closes the diagram (9). The converse follows from Proposition 4.3 and the ideal property.…”
Section: The Factorization Theoremmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…On the other hand, in the last ten years a considerable effort has been made in order to increase the knowledge on the polynomials that belong to some operator ideal (see for instance [2,3,4,12,22] and the references therein). The case of the p-dominated polynomials is particularly relevant and has been intensively studied ( [6,7,8,9,10]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of spaces fulfilling the hypotheses of Theorem 5.7 is assured by G. Pisier [83]. Also, cot E = 2 is a necessary condition for Theorem 5.7 since in [24] it is also proved that…”
Section: Proof (Real Case) It Suffices To Deal Withmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We recall that P ∈ P( m X; Y ) is absolutely (r, s)summing (in symbols P ∈ P as(r,s) ( m X; Y )) if the sequence (P (x j )) ∞ j=1 belongs to ℓ r (Y ) whenever (x j ) ∞ j=1 is weakly s-summable in X (see [2]). In [12,Theorem 3.1] it is proved that if m is an even integer, if Z is an infinite dimensional real Banach space and if r < 1, then the coincidence P ( m Z; R) = P as(r,s) ( m Z; R) implies that Id Z is mr 1−r , ssumming. A careful examination of [12,Theorem 3.1] shows that the argument of [12] cannot be extended to the case of odd integers and complex scalars.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%