2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dominant Mutations in GRM1 Cause Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 44

Abstract: In Figure 1C, the substitution ''p.Tyr792Cys'' incorrectly appeared as ''p.Tyr292Cys.'' This error has been corrected online. The authors regret this mistake.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, a gene that encodes the Glutamate , and GRIN2C (Z-score 1.85). GRM1 is one of the most abundant mGluRs in the mammalian central nervous system and is present at particularly high levels in Purkinje cells [69]. There is plenty of evidence of its implication in diseases involving glutamatergic dysfunction and abnormal synaptic plasticity [70], which are known to be crucial mechanisms for cognitive processes.…”
Section: Temporal and Spatial Gene Expression In Postmortem Brains Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, a gene that encodes the Glutamate , and GRIN2C (Z-score 1.85). GRM1 is one of the most abundant mGluRs in the mammalian central nervous system and is present at particularly high levels in Purkinje cells [69]. There is plenty of evidence of its implication in diseases involving glutamatergic dysfunction and abnormal synaptic plasticity [70], which are known to be crucial mechanisms for cognitive processes.…”
Section: Temporal and Spatial Gene Expression In Postmortem Brains Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genes causing SCAs code for a large variety of proteins including ion channels (Riess et al, 1997;Zhuchenko et al, 1997;Waters et al, 2006;Lee et al, 2012;Coutelier et al, 2015;Fogel et al, 2015;Morino et al, 2015), transcription factors and repressors (Orr et al, 1993;Koide et al, 1999;Lin et al, 2018), scaffolding proteins (Ikeda et al, 2006;Tsoi et al, 2014), or signaling kinases (Chen et al, 2003;Houlden et al, 2007), phosphatases (Holmes et al, 1999), and receptors (Storey et al, 2001;Hara et al, 2004;Hara et al, 2008;Huang et al, 2012;Watson et al, 2017). Despite this heterogeneity, SCA patients share a slow dramatic degeneration of the cerebellum and its afferent and efferent systems, suggesting a common point of interception, wherein SCA causing mutations converge and promotes the onset of these neurodegenerative diseases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the polyQ group, diseasecausing repeat expansions have been identified in non-coding regions of the gene in some SCAs (SCA8, 10,12,31,36,37) similarly to Friedreich ataxia, which is the most common autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia (Table 2) [4,5]. Moreover, conventional mutations (point mutations, deletions, insertions) can cause certain types of SCA, including SCA5, 11, 13, 14, 15/16, 19/22, 21, 23, 26-29, 34, 35, 38, 40-47 (Table 3) [4][5][6][7][8][9], whereas in some forms of SCA, including SCA4, 18, 20, 25, 30 and 32 only the genetic loci, but not the responsible gene, have been identified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%