Debating Cultural Hybridity 2015
DOI: 10.5040/9781350219496.ch-012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dominant and Demotic Discourses of Culture: Their Relevance to Multi-Ethnic Alliances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While theories of hybridity tend to focus on the global-local dichotomy (Bhabha, 1994), we show that tensions not only exist across but also within cultures. All cultures are born out of struggles and the negotiation of differences; in many instances, these struggles are not just matters of history but are active and ongoing (Baumann, 2017;Spivak, 2003). Encounters between the global and the local even have the potential to widen these intracultural chasms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While theories of hybridity tend to focus on the global-local dichotomy (Bhabha, 1994), we show that tensions not only exist across but also within cultures. All cultures are born out of struggles and the negotiation of differences; in many instances, these struggles are not just matters of history but are active and ongoing (Baumann, 2017;Spivak, 2003). Encounters between the global and the local even have the potential to widen these intracultural chasms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important as this debate is, it can also tend to unwittingly essentialize cultures. Even when rejoicing in cultural “contamination,” hybridity paradoxically assumes an initial state of “purity” that a culture never possesses—for all cultures are born out of the negotiation of differences, negotiations that are never quite complete (Baumann, 2017; Spivak, 2003). Terms, such as global and local, West and East, even “American,” “Brazilian,” “Indian,” “Japanese,” and so on, eradicate fluctuations and distinctions—immanent intra-cultural tensions that are not just matters of history but remain active and, in many cases, have become still more pronounced on account of changes wrought by globalization.…”
Section: Cultural Hybridity In Transnational Movementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Freud (1960), with his famous distinction between the ego (self-inthe-world) and id (self), along with Snyder (1974) and Goffman (1956), are but a few of the advocates of a fragmented self, of the division of the individual and of the struggle between self-identification and the identification made by others. And it is this very struggle that leads contemporary man to move beyond boundaries that remain fluid, difficult to define and constantly reconstructed within specific social, economic or geo-political contexts (Baumann, 1996(Baumann, , 1997.…”
Section: Negotiating Oneself As Anothermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus inter-ethnic, former Eastern Bloc-related networks are easily created. They confront the structural or channelled multiculturalism, which is well defined by Gerd Baumann's research in London as 'demotic discourse' (Baumann, 1997), and ethnic communalism through the crosscutting ties of the inter-ethnic networks. This is clearly seen through discursive practices, i.e.…”
Section: (C) Alliances Of 'One's Own' Peoplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is clearly seen through discursive practices, i.e. the 'demotic discourses' (Baumann, 1997) of Eastern European immigrants from the former Communist region in multicultural Chicago. It is how the labour migrants and 'brain drain' immigrants with a Lithuanian, Ukrainian, Russian or Polish background are recreating the region by using Russian as a lingua franca and by sharing work places and the media.…”
Section: (C) Alliances Of 'One's Own' Peoplementioning
confidence: 99%