2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00254-006-0441-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dominance of lithogenic effect for nickel, cobalt, chromium and mercury as found in freshly deposited sediments of the river Subernarekha, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of calculation methods have been put forward for quantifying the degree of metal enrichment or pollution in soils, sediments and dusts [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. In the study, geoaccumulation index (I geo ), enrichment factor (EF), pollution index (PI) and integrated pollution index (IPI) were calculated to assess the heavy metal contamination level in the street dust.…”
Section: Contamination Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of calculation methods have been put forward for quantifying the degree of metal enrichment or pollution in soils, sediments and dusts [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. In the study, geoaccumulation index (I geo ), enrichment factor (EF), pollution index (PI) and integrated pollution index (IPI) were calculated to assess the heavy metal contamination level in the street dust.…”
Section: Contamination Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Spatial distribution of Arsenic (mg/kg) in surface sediments, AIE, India Jain et al 2007;Upadhyay et al 2007;Krishna and Govil 2007). Before determining the indices, the values of As for surface and profile sediments were normalized with UCC and Tertiary shale (Fig.…”
Section: Quality Of Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%