2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00026-012-0145-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domesticity in Generalized Quadrangles

Abstract: An automorphism of a generalized quadrangle is called domestic if it maps no chamber, which is here an incident point-line pair, to an opposite chamber. We call it point-domestic if it maps no point to an opposite one and line-domestic if it maps no line to an opposite one. It is clear that a duality in a generalized quadrangle is always point-domestic and line-domestic.In this paper, we classify all domestic automorphisms of generalized quadrangles. Besides three exceptional cases occurring in the small quadr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For rank 2, there are counterexamples in the case of finite generalized quadrangles (with non-classical parameters, see [11]). …”
Section: Lemma 53 the Duality θ Is Line-domesticmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For rank 2, there are counterexamples in the case of finite generalized quadrangles (with non-classical parameters, see [11]). …”
Section: Lemma 53 the Duality θ Is Line-domesticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the spherical case, they proved that only the identity maps no flag to an opposite flag. This led Temmermans, Thas and the present author [10,11,12] to a more refined definition of J-domestic automorphism: this is an automorphism of a spherical building over the type set I ⊇ J mapping no flag of type J to an opposite flag. For J = I, we obtain domesticity as defined above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…But this is false in general, as [2] contains some counterexamples. However, we have taken a closer look at these counterexamples in [7,8] and could classify the automorphisms of projective spaces and generalized quadrangles which map no chamber to an opposite one. The bounds d then follow easily.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%