2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2028.2008.00932.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domestication: an indigenous method in conserving plant diversity on farmlands in west Usambara Mountains, Tanzania

Abstract: The role of domestication in conserving indigenous plant diversity on farmlands was studied in West Usambara Mountains, Tanzania by structured, semi‐structured and unstructured interviews; participant observation; literature review and botanical identification in March 2006. There was high diversity of indigenous plant species on farmlands (73%) compared with exotics (27%). For the number of plants per species, a small proportion of indigenous plants (14%) were recorded compared with exotics (86%). Although th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kindt et al (2007) reported 92 indigenous tree species in lowland Acacia-Commiphora bushland, but still up to 105 species in forest vegetation types of higher zones. Comparable results of dominant exotics in highlands are reported from the Usambara Mountains, Tanzania, where 73% of the total on-farm plant species were indigenous, but this represented only 14% of the total plant individuals (Msuya et al 2008). However, no exact altitude data and frequencies were documented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Kindt et al (2007) reported 92 indigenous tree species in lowland Acacia-Commiphora bushland, but still up to 105 species in forest vegetation types of higher zones. Comparable results of dominant exotics in highlands are reported from the Usambara Mountains, Tanzania, where 73% of the total on-farm plant species were indigenous, but this represented only 14% of the total plant individuals (Msuya et al 2008). However, no exact altitude data and frequencies were documented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The domestication rate of 89% is in line with the findings of Hamilton (1989), which revealed that domestication as part of the traditional agroforestry system and a conservation practice started in the West Usambara Mountains as early as about 2000 years ago. Similarly, other researchers reported domestication in the study area (Kaoneka 1996;Moshi 1997;Msuya 1998;Msuya et al 2008). Certain medicinal plants, such as Albizia spp., Erythrina abyssinica, Catha edulis and Tamarindus indica, were domesticated deliberately to conserve them against excessive harvesting from their natural habitats (the forests).…”
Section: Domestication Of Medicinal Plantsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The Shambaa tribe domesticated more plants (8 AE 4 (SE) than other tribes (4 AE 6 (SE), and the difference was significant (P ¼ 0.001, t ¼ 5.84). This difference could be attributed to the fact that the Shambaa is the native tribe in the study area and other tribes are immigrants to the West Usambara Mountains, and that domestication has been an indigenous conservation practice for wild plants in these mountains for over 2000 years (Hamilton 1989;Msuya 1998;Msuya et al 2008). Also, most of the Shambaa are traditional healers and hence domestication of medicinal plants is pursued as a way of facilitating their services, and traditional healing as a (Msuya and Kideghesho 2009), and the traditional healers' knowledge of medicine is not commonly shared with other people.…”
Section: Ethnicitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Throughout the world, the process of plant domestication has been either broadly analysed [59] or studied for species or group of species including acacias [10], yam [11, 12], tomatoes [13], barley [1], rice [4, 14], baobab [15], leafy vegetables [16], and fonio [17, 18]. These studies revealed the existence of different steps in the domestication process and highlighted that the practices used to highly vary with the species and the sociolinguistic groups across countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%