1993
DOI: 10.2307/281459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domesticated Sunflower in Fifth Millennium B.P. Temporal Context: New Evidence from Middle Tennessee

Abstract: Carbonized seeds of domesticated sunflower (Helianthus annuus var. macrocarpus Ckll.) recovered from the Hayes site in middle Tennessee yielded an accelerator date of 4265 ± 60 B.P. This is the earliest date for domesticated sunflower, extending the known age of this eastern North American domesticate by 1,400 years.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lentz et al (2001a, b) argued for a single domestication of sunflower and speculated that the probable founders of domesticated sunflowers originated in Mexico, not the eastern US, as had been proposed earlier (Heiser 1985). Heiser (2001) disputed the hypothesis of a single domestication in Mexico (Lentz et al 2001a, b) and, on the basis of archaeological data from Middle Tennessee (Crites 1993), suggested the possibility of multiple domestication origins, a possibility supported by the analysis presented here (Figs. 4-6).…”
Section: Patterns Of Genetic Diversity In Domesticated and Wild Sunflsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Lentz et al (2001a, b) argued for a single domestication of sunflower and speculated that the probable founders of domesticated sunflowers originated in Mexico, not the eastern US, as had been proposed earlier (Heiser 1985). Heiser (2001) disputed the hypothesis of a single domestication in Mexico (Lentz et al 2001a, b) and, on the basis of archaeological data from Middle Tennessee (Crites 1993), suggested the possibility of multiple domestication origins, a possibility supported by the analysis presented here (Figs. 4-6).…”
Section: Patterns Of Genetic Diversity In Domesticated and Wild Sunflsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Chenopod and these presumably nondomesticated plants were used for their starchy seeds, sunflower and sumpweed for their oily seeds, and squash for its seeds and flesh. Along with recent genetic and archaeological literature on sunflower, sumpweed, and gourd/squash (Cucurbita pepo L.) (Asch and Asch, 1985;Cowan, 1997;Crites, 1993;Decker-Walters et al, 1993;Harter et al, 2004;Wills and Burke, 2006), our findings here provide compelling support for the development of an entirely indigenous agricultural complex in eastern North America. The crop complex developed from a diverse group of weedy taxa within the context of a mainly hunting and gathering lifestyle, and came to dominate Eastern Woodland archaeobotanical assemblages during the Woodland Period (Milner, 2004;Smith and Yarnell, 2009;Yarnell, 1974).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Cultivated sunflower was domesticated from wild sunflower in the eastern United States more than 4000 years ago (Crites 1993;Harter et al 2004;Blackman et al 2011). While cultivated and wild sunflower are cross-compatible due to their common ancestry, domestication and continued selection has led to their differentiation in many morphological and fitness related traits (reviewed in Burke et al 2002b).…”
Section: Study Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%