2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2005.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domestic violence treatment response and recidivism: A review and implications for the study of family violence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
82
0
13

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(92 reference statements)
0
82
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, since help seeking has been associated with IPV severity, the opportunity to apply our findings, at least to samples of similar IPV severity, appears relevant (Haaland et al 2005;Pape and Stefansen 2004;Sartin et al 2006). We also relied on women_s retrospective self-report of IPV experiences, which may have been subject to recall bias.…”
Section: Methodological Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, since help seeking has been associated with IPV severity, the opportunity to apply our findings, at least to samples of similar IPV severity, appears relevant (Haaland et al 2005;Pape and Stefansen 2004;Sartin et al 2006). We also relied on women_s retrospective self-report of IPV experiences, which may have been subject to recall bias.…”
Section: Methodological Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En el ámbito internacional se han realizado diferentes revisiones sistemáticas de este tipo de programas desarrollados tanto en el medio comunitario como dentro de la prisión (Aldarondo, 2002;Babcock, Green y Robie, 2004;Feder y Wilson, 2005;Gondolf, 2004;Lemire, Rondeau, Brochu, Schneeberger y Brodeur, 1996;Murphy y Ting, 2010;Sartin, Hansen y Huss, 2006;Saunders, 2008). Respecto a su efectividad, dichas revisiones no han proporcionado resultados concluyentes.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Las revisiones realizadas a nivel internacional que han evaluado los programas han mostrado resultados discretos (Babcock, Green y Robie, 2004;Feder y Wilson, 2005;Murphy y Ting, 2010;Sartin, Hansen y Huss, 2006;Saunders, 2008). De este modo, algunas de las principales variables incluidas en los procesos de evaluación han sido: a) la orientación teórica del programa; b) la realización obligatoria o voluntaria del mismo; c) el ámbito de aplicación, en la prisión o en la comunidad; y d) el tipo de información utilizada para la evaluación con la inclusión o no del informe de la víctima.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified