2014
DOI: 10.1177/1354066114553682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domestic structures, foreign economic policies and global economic order: Implications from the rise of large emerging economies

Abstract: The rise of the large emerging economies of Brazil, India and China can easily be counted among the most important contemporary structural changes in the global political economy. This article attempts to determine whether these countries have a common institutional model for governing their economies and addresses the implications of these commonalities for global economic institutions. The approach consists of three major steps: first, a general ideal type for encompassing capitalism in these large emerging … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
116
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
3
116
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Scharpf, 2011;Gabor and Ban, 2012;Hall, 2012Hall, , 2014Höpner and Schäfer, 2012;Hancké, 2013a, b;Johnston et al, 2013;Panagiotarea, 2013;Becker, 2014a;Höpner and Lutter, 2014;Kuokštis, forthcoming;Streeck, 2014;Beramendi et al, 2015b), but also tensions within the global political economy, due to a shift of production towards emerging markets (e.g. Nölke and Vliegenthart, 2009;Nölke, 2011;Bohle and Greskovits, 2012;Kalinowski, 2013;De Ville and Vermeiren, 2014;Vermeiren, 2014;Nölke et al, 2015). On the other side, some CCC scholars find their prime source of inspiration not in ( post-)VoC, but in the (institutionalist) Regulation perspective, Dependency theory and post-Kaleckian macroeconomics.…”
Section: Three Generations Of CC Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scharpf, 2011;Gabor and Ban, 2012;Hall, 2012Hall, , 2014Höpner and Schäfer, 2012;Hancké, 2013a, b;Johnston et al, 2013;Panagiotarea, 2013;Becker, 2014a;Höpner and Lutter, 2014;Kuokštis, forthcoming;Streeck, 2014;Beramendi et al, 2015b), but also tensions within the global political economy, due to a shift of production towards emerging markets (e.g. Nölke and Vliegenthart, 2009;Nölke, 2011;Bohle and Greskovits, 2012;Kalinowski, 2013;De Ville and Vermeiren, 2014;Vermeiren, 2014;Nölke et al, 2015). On the other side, some CCC scholars find their prime source of inspiration not in ( post-)VoC, but in the (institutionalist) Regulation perspective, Dependency theory and post-Kaleckian macroeconomics.…”
Section: Three Generations Of CC Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on concepts developed in Comparative Capitalism, we can explain preferences in international economic negotiations by looking at domestic capitalist institutions, while assuming that states will try to prevent international institutions that strongly interfere with those institutions that support domestic capitalist development (Fioretos, 2010(Fioretos, , 2011Nölke, 2011;Kalinowski, 2013;Nölke et al, 2014). From this perspective, the dominating role of state factions and of national capitalists is not unique to China, but rather typical for the type of capitalism that has been evolving in large emerging economies such as India and Brazil.…”
Section: Factions In a Broader Perspective: China As A Smementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the core of the article is the assumption that different models of capitalism provide important analytical leverage for understanding the behavior of (emerging) economies in international institutions. In line with an emerging research program on 'second image IPE', we link the comparative institutional study of capitalism with the analysis of broader global institutions and structures (Fioretos, 2010(Fioretos, , 2011Nölke, 2011;McNally, 2012;Kalinowski, 2013;Vermeiren, 2014;Nölke et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at least from an International Political Economy perspective, the most interesting question is whether the increasing importance of China will lead to a different, more statist model of global capitalist regulation, if compared with the current liberal model. So far, this question has only been addressed by a number of popular, somewhat speculative treatments (Choate, 2009;Bremmer, 2010), while comprehensive empirical studies have only just begun (McNally, 2012;Nölke et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The latter have been characterized as 'state-permeated market economies' (Nölke, 2012 and this issue;Nölke et al, 2014), given the pre-dominance of close networks between public authorities and private domestic capital. The most prominent application of comparative capitalism categories to Chinese foreign economic policies has been developed by McNally (2012 and this issue).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%