2017
DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2017.1313661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domestic photovoltaic systems: the governance of occupant use

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper challenges the traditionally dominant technological approach of introducing new technologies into homes, and justifies further debate regarding how technologies and inhabitants are considered together in academic research and policy to understand the issues of the energy saving gap in homes (Shove and Walker 2014). The findings build on the study by Frances and Stevenson (2018) by identifying the transformation of PV meaning from the provisioning side to inhabitants, and the meaning transformations between inhabitants during occupation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This paper challenges the traditionally dominant technological approach of introducing new technologies into homes, and justifies further debate regarding how technologies and inhabitants are considered together in academic research and policy to understand the issues of the energy saving gap in homes (Shove and Walker 2014). The findings build on the study by Frances and Stevenson (2018) by identifying the transformation of PV meaning from the provisioning side to inhabitants, and the meaning transformations between inhabitants during occupation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Previous studies have examined the role of building actors in shaping inhabitants' engagement with their domestic technologies (Gram-Hanssen et al 2017, Wade, Murtagh, and Hitchings 2018, Frances and Stevenson 2018, and the role of the fragmented contractual arrangements and planning requirements in omitting the PV systems from the main design during the construction process (Boyd and Schweber 2018). Other studies have focused on the impact of the PV system in changing inhabitants' energy consumption practices (Haas et al 1999, Keirstead 2007; the possible ways that inhabitants can improve their use of PV energy (Luthander et al 2015, Jenny, Lo pez, andMosler 2006), and in relation to the introduction/ change of PV policies and incentives (Wittenberg, Blobaum, andMatthies 2018, Baborska-Narozny, Stevenson, andFrances 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, two major drawbacks of co-creation were identified as well. Firstly, lay-persons do not have professional knowledge, which can lead to suboptimal decisions and higher costs (see [39,48]. Secondly, involving a large number of actors was reported to be resource intensive, as it slows down the project and increases overall costs [59].…”
Section: Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a network is a possible type of platform for interactive learning, since a network structure has a positive influence on knowledge sharing (Chow and Chan, 2008). In a network, localized knowledge and information can be negotiated through face-to-face interactions between different actors (Pinch et al, 2003;Frances and Stevenson, 2018). This platform will support learning even better if it is guided by a bottom-up process through which it is possible to create and exchange knowledge and information through interactive learning-by-doing (Antonelli, 1996;Neij et al, 2017;Maskell and Malmberg, 1999).…”
Section: Knowledge and Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…COP theory argues that a network structure helps to create knowledge through practice. Therefore, work with energy efficiency should be seen as a negotiation between actors with conflicting priorities and goals, which is transformed within a network (Frances and Stevenson, 2018;Latour, 1987). I use COP theory again in article 4, where I compare my two case studies and examine how and why different policy programs may have different outcomes.…”
Section: Community Of Practicementioning
confidence: 99%