2002
DOI: 10.2307/972113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domestic and Political Lives of Classic Maya Elites: The Excavation of Rapidly Abandoned Structures at Aguateca, Guatemala

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
80
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(16 reference statements)
2
80
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Located in the Pasión region, Aguateca was studied from 1990 through 2005 by T.I., D.T., and K.A., providing 11 radiocarbon dates. Bachand excavated Punta de Chimino as part of the Aguateca Project and obtained 11 radiocarbon assays (19)(20)(21). We began to work at Ceibal as the Ceibal-Petexbatun Archaeological Project (CPAP) in 2005.…”
Section: Ceibalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Located in the Pasión region, Aguateca was studied from 1990 through 2005 by T.I., D.T., and K.A., providing 11 radiocarbon dates. Bachand excavated Punta de Chimino as part of the Aguateca Project and obtained 11 radiocarbon assays (19)(20)(21). We began to work at Ceibal as the Ceibal-Petexbatun Archaeological Project (CPAP) in 2005.…”
Section: Ceibalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The North Group consists of a large platform which is topped by one long palace-like construction with fourteen or so chambers (Structure W), one low platform that is almost flat at the top (Structure 99) and at least two low mounds which, most probably are the remains of residential constructions (figure 3 The walls were preserved up to a height of 0.30/0.50 m and it appears that its lower parts were constructed of masonry while its upper section and roof were made of perishable materials (figure 5), similar to many other Maya structures (e.g. at Aguateca; see Inomata et al, 2002). The floor of Structure 99A was scattered with numerous artefacts (figure 6).…”
Section: Structure 99 and Terminal Classic Occupationmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Pottery is usually intentionally scattered around and it is interesting that the vessels are only partially reconstructable (Stross, 1998). What is even more interesting is that ritual deposits of this type never contain animal bones (only as carved artifacts), while human bones are sometimes present (in spite of this, the structure usually cannot be considered a burial (Farr and Arroyave, 2007;Inomata et al, 2001). In some instances, all area of the ritual was found covered with a layer of white marl or clay (Wagner, 2002;Freidel et al, 1998).…”
Section: Structure 99 and Terminal Classic Occupationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tetimpa in Puebla is another site where volcanic deposition has produced well-preserved remains (Panfil et al, 1998;Plunket and Uruñuela, 1998). Aguateca (Inomata and Stiver, 1998;Inomata et al, 2002) and Xochicalco (González Crespo et al, 1995;Webb and Hirth, 2000) were rapidly abandoned political capitals with rich house floor assemblages. These and other case studies are brought together in Inomata and Webb (2003).…”
Section: Household Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 98%