Domestic and overseas doctorates and their academic entry-level jobs in South Korea

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the development and challenges of doctoral education in Korea. In particular, it focusses on the differences between overseas and domestic doctorates in terms of training, supply and demand in the academic workforce, their academic entry-level jobs and employment status. Design/methodology/approach This study applied document analysis to mainly secondary data sources. The data were drawn from the Statistical Yearbooks of Education, Annual Science and Technology Statistics, the Database for Overseas Doctorates Registration and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Findings The findings indicate that the doctoral education system in Korea, in terms of both size and quality, has demonstrated significant development for last four decades. However, the results also show that overseas doctorates have relative advantages for their academic job entry over domestic doctorates, and the major research universities are more likely to hire those with overseas doctorates than domestic doctorates. Originality/value This study presents the evolution of the doctoral education system in Korea, which has not yet been considered in the international research.

“Why should a ‘foreigner’ be better than me?”: preferential practices in junior academic faculty recruitment among mainland Chinese universities

“…Given the pressure to advance towards internationalisation and world-class distinction, the mainland Chinese university employers’ shared preferences for overseas doctorates were more revealing than surprising. Similar (e.g., Jung, 2018 ) or opposite (e.g., Chiang, 2021 ) tendencies have been identified in other national and regional contexts. To a large extent, China’s stunning progress in internationalising its higher education sector over the recent decade shares the feature in common with its expansion practices that are built on the East Asian model of a “strong nation-state structure with instrumentalism” (Jiang & Ke, 2021 ).…”

“…In today’s higher education, ambitious universities tend to be overachievers when it comes to human resources management, as building quality faculty is key to the success of the business of universities. While a relatively comprehensive picture has been drawn of the world’s established systems (e.g., Burgan, 2006 ; Clark & Ma 2005 ; Crothall et al, 1997 ; Hearn et al, 2013 ; Marini, 2018 ), the faculty management practices of universities in higher education systems that are undergoing rapid changes have been studied to a lesser extent (Jung, 2018 ). As a high-achieving rising system, China’s higher education has received growing scholarly attention (Song, 2018 ), with its talent management policy being one of the prominent topics of discussion.…”

An autoethnographic narrative of the diasporic experience of a Chinese female Ph.D. returnee’s entry into the domestic academic job market during COVID-19: An ecological environment perspective

“…Research throughout the world has revealed that both advantages and challenges are experienced during Ph.D. returnees’ entry into the DAJM. In comparison to their domestic counterparts, Ph.D. graduates are regarded as national treasures (Chen, 2005 ), enjoy higher academic status (Jung, 2018 ; Rizvi, 2000 ), and are more likely to be promoted to leadership roles (Chen, 2017 ). Such advantages are accumulated through overseas learning and life experience in relation to transnational human capital such as knowledge and ability (Gerhards et al, 2017 ), transnational cultural capital, for example, overseas degrees (Kim, 2016 ), and transnational social capital, including international social networks (Woolley et al, 2008 ).…”

Institutional prestige, academic supervision and research productivity of international PhD students: Evidence from Chinese returnees

“…The initiatives of world-class universities emphasise international academic publications and faculty members who can enhance the university's research profile and boost its ranking in the global university league tables. To strengthen university competitiveness in global university rankings, East Asian universities actively recruit academics with doctoral degrees from advanced Western countries, such as the United Kingdom and the United States (Jung, 2018;Kim, 2016;Shin et al, 2014). Recent studies indicated that returnees with doctoral degrees from Western countries are generally academically productive (e.g.…”

“…Recent studies indicated that returnees with doctoral degrees from Western countries are generally academically productive (e.g. Jonkers and Cruz-Castro, 2013;Lu and Zhang, 2015) and highly regarded for academic employment (Jiang et al, 2020;Jung 2018) and technology transfer (Zweig et al, 2004) in East Asia.…”