1989
DOI: 10.1016/0022-247x(89)90049-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domains of validity for some of Ramanujan's continued fraction formulas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our approach is similar to that in several recent papers [5], [6], [12], [13] on the subject where Pincherle's theorem [11] has been used to bring out the connection between several of Ramanujan's Chapter 12 entries and the general theory of hypergeometric orthogonal functions (Askey and Wilson [1], Wilson [18]). For other approaches to explaining some of Ramanujan's continued fraction entries see [3], [10], [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our approach is similar to that in several recent papers [5], [6], [12], [13] on the subject where Pincherle's theorem [11] has been used to bring out the connection between several of Ramanujan's Chapter 12 entries and the general theory of hypergeometric orthogonal functions (Askey and Wilson [1], Wilson [18]). For other approaches to explaining some of Ramanujan's continued fraction entries see [3], [10], [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the left side of (3.5) we can apply the 'parabola theorem' (see Jones and Thron [11, p. 99] and Jacobsen [10]), since from (2.6),…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark Interestingly, this proof, deriving from extending the right side of (3.30), coincides at the finish with Jacobsen's proof [8], which uses a theorem, due to her [7] and Waadeland [16], on tails of continued fractions. Both proofs eventually rely on Hill's result from Theorem 6 applied to the same 2 F 1 function.…”
Section: Entry 9 ([2]mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…By an argument of Jacobsen [3], we can extend the domains of convergence for , n, x to the case when , n are arbitrary complex numbers and x is complex with Re x > 0. This completes the proof of Corollary 3.2.…”
Section: Corollary 32 (Entry 39) Let and N Denote Arbitrary Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%