2005
DOI: 10.1016/s0005-7894(05)80067-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domains of risk in the developmental continuity of fire setting

Abstract: Juvenile fire setting is a serious, dangerous, and costly behavior. The majority of research examining youth fire setting has been cross-sectional. We sought to examine early risk attributes that could differentiate fire setters from non-fire setters, in addition to examining their association with the developmental continuity of fire-setting behavior into late childhood. Using a sample of 361 youth drawn from 4 different U.S. communities, this study examined the association between a broad array of risk varia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are similar to McCarty and McMahon's (2005) study of younger community children, in which firesetters differed from nonfiresetters on 13 of 19 risk factors, including hyperactivity, impulsivity, aggression, and antisocial behavior.…”
Section: Results Of Studies Using Community Samplessupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings are similar to McCarty and McMahon's (2005) study of younger community children, in which firesetters differed from nonfiresetters on 13 of 19 risk factors, including hyperactivity, impulsivity, aggression, and antisocial behavior.…”
Section: Results Of Studies Using Community Samplessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The child's initial level of covert behavior and involvement in firesetting were predictors of recidivism at follow-up. McCarty and McMahon (2005) found that persistent firesetters in their longitudinal study experienced more harsh discipline and physical abuse from their parents, and lower parental warmth than nonfiresetters. Compared to persistent firesetters, those who desisted had greater academic achievement.…”
Section: Firesetting Recidivismmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Studies show that, relative to non-firesetters, children who set fires are more likely to originate from large and financially impoverished families (Bradford, 1982;Heath, Hardesty, Goldfine, & Walker, 1983) characterized by neglectful parenting styles (Showers & Pickrell, 1987;Slavkin, 2000) and physical or sexual abuse (McCarty & McMahon, 2005; Moore, Thompson-Pope, & Whited, 1996;Showers & Pickrell, 1987). Such experiences are highly likely to negatively affect a childÕs ability to form secure attachments with caregivers (Perry, 1997), and also their ability to develop appropriate social skills and affective self regulatory behavior during adolescence and adulthood (Ainsworth, 1989;Bowlby, 1969Bowlby, , 1973Root, MacKay, Henderson, Del Bove, & Warling, 2008).…”
Section: Developmental Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children and youth who set fires can be very difficult to manage. These children and youth have been reported to have a greater likelihood of psychopathology in general (Dadds and Fraser 2005) and antisocial traits in particular (McCarty and McMahon 2005), self-harming behaviors (Miller and Fritzon 2007), and sexual deviance (Fras 1997). Others have reported fire setting among children and youth with developmental disabilities (Taylor and Lindsay 2007;Taylor et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%