Domains of Quality of Life of People with Profound Multiple Disabilities: the Perspective of Parents and Direct Support Staff

Abstract

Background This study considered the general validity of the basic domains of quality of life that appear in theoretical models, in relation to people with profound multiple disabilities. The authors examined how parents and direct support staff operationalized these basic domains for people with profound multiple disabilities. They investigated the effect of the support setting and age of people with profound multiple disabilities on this operationalization. Methods A number (n ¼ 76) of parents and direct support staff of people with profound multiple disabilities were interviewed. Transcripts were analysed in depth. Results Results showed that the five basic domains as described within the model of Felce Retardation] were identified spontaneously by more than half of the respondents as being salient for the quality of life of people with profound multiple disabilities. When asked explicitly, this value rose to between 88.2 and 100%. The operationalization of these basic domains by parents and direct support staff differed in several aspects from operationalizations for other target groups. Neither age nor support setting turned out to have a significant effect on the operationalization. Conclusions The results supported the multidimensionality of quality of life and the validity of the basic domains for people with profound multiple disabilities. The content of the domains of quality of life differed, however, to a considerable extent for people with profound multiple disabilities. Furthermore, these people are extremely dependent on others for the gratification of their needs and therefore for their quality of life. Ó 2005 BILD Publications Positive affect 82.1 (55) Individuality 62.7 (42) Respect, status and self-esteem 50.7 (34) Atmosphere 41.8 (28)Values are represented as % (n).

Peripheral Autonomic Signals as Access Pathways for Individuals with Severe Disabilities: A Literature Appraisal

“…In these situations, conventional and commercially available access pathways are ineffective, rendering the individual unable to express functional intent or to interact with his or her environment [12]. That these individual are not afforded a consistent, reliable means of expressing functional intent results in a significant decrease in their independence, dignity and overall quality of life [13].…”

A Comparison of Alternative Models of Individual Quality of Life for Social Service Recipients

“…Amongst the models of individual quality of life that are most widely used, special note should be taken of the Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale by Cummins (1996Cummins ( , 2000Cummins ( , 2005, the model by Perry (1995, 1996)-also applied to, and adapted for, people with severe and multiple disability (Petry et al 2005(Petry et al , 2007, and the model proposed by Verdugo 2002, 2007;Schalock et al in press;Verdugo 2006;Verdugo et al 2010)-one of the most cited today and with major impacts on field of intellectual and developmental disabilities.…”

Learning as a possible sign of non-reflective consciousness in persons with a diagnosis of vegetative state and pervasive motor impairment

“…Their interaction (basic communication) with the environment could be viewed as: (a) a form of support (enhancement) of their neural plasticity, which is believed to be a fundamental condition to improve learning in situations of severe/extensive brain injury (as already demonstrated in other rehabilitation domains, e.g., Kleim and Jones 2008; Rossini and Dal Forno 2004); (b) a way to improve their situation regarding their immediate impact, overall dignity and social image, and (c) an encouragement for the environment to extend the range of responses to target and the categories of stimuli to contemplate within the daily intervention programs (Lancioni et al 2008b, c;Petry et al 2005;Tsuchiya and Adolphs 2007).…”