Domain Theory, Its Models and Concepts

Andreasen, Mogens Myrup; Howard, Thomas J.; Bruun, Hans Peter Lomholt

doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-6338-1_9

Cited by 17 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These include existing theories and perspectives, from within and beyond the field. Domain theory is the knowledge concerning the phenomenon itself or relevant constructs (Jaakkola, 2020; Lukka & Vinnari, 2014), or a collection of constructs relevant to the phenomenon (Andreasen, Howard, & Bruun, 2014). Finally, findings were synthesized and discussed.…”

Section: Research Analysis Planmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Religious Struggle Framework: Religious Experience from Struggle to Transformation

Aminnuddin

2022

Islam G. & C. Jour

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The phenomenon of young individuals struggling with their religious beliefs can lead to wide-ranging consequences. Existing studies are dominantly Western in context, which may not be applicable in other settings. Therefore, as contextualized and rationalized through an Islamic perspective, the present study aims to build a framework to explore religious struggle. Through a qualitative research design, multiple methods were employed: responses from six Muslim interviewees were reconstructed into a single monologue using the composite narrative method, and then narrative analysis was done, followed by method theory and domain theory analyses being conducted. Constructs were identified and discussed, theories as lenses to view the phenomenon were employed, and further evaluations of the phenomenon and relevant constructs were done. A discussion was integrated with each analysis. Through synthesizing the findings, I propose a framework called the religious struggle framework (RSF). With the RSF’s flexible, adaptable, and modifiable nature, the framework can be used beyond the present study’s population. It can be utilized in both quantitative and qualitative research designs. Limitations and recommendations for further research were also presented.

show abstract

Section: Research Analysis Planmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Religious Struggle Framework: Religious Experience from Struggle to Transformation

Aminnuddin

2022

Islam G. & C. Jour

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…To develop a better understanding of these situations, and to develop tools and methods to address them, a better and more detailed understanding of design practice and the theory and concepts that underpin it may be needed. In terms of theory, for example, consider domain theory, which regards the designer as working in three domains (Andreasen et al, 2014):  the activity domain, which focuses on how the artefact is used, including the product's lifecycle,  the organ domain, which focuses on what the artefact is able to dohow the functional elements interact to create the required effects for the artefact,  the part domain, which focuses on the artefact's parts, how they relate to each other and how the artefact is made in a manufacturing or construction process. Different design cases might be distinguished according to the domains in which the design activity takes place.…”

Section: Deepening Understanding Of Engineering Design Practicementioning

confidence: 99%

Towards a Debate on the Positioning of Engineering Design

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper is an invitation to a debate on the positioning of engineering design as a field of research. The paper lists a multiplicity of interpretations of design, questioning whether they are sufficient to describe engineering design in all its variety. Following a critical analysis of attempts to describe design's unique characteristics, and observations on the nature of design made from outside of the design research community, it presents a list of situations of design that the authors have observed in engineering practice, describing especially the relationship between design, technology and society. The paper then explores what these situations imply about the questions researchers should ask about the nature of design knowledge and expertise, and examines how the different situations might be categorised, before exploring the positioning of engineering design research with respect to other academic disciplines, in particular management and the human and earth sciences. The paper concludes with a call to a debate on the nature of engineering design with the aim to define this field more clearly to ourselves and to others.

show abstract

“…A product system can be described from two perspectives, the structural characteristics (structure) and the functional properties (behaviour) (Andreasen et al, 2014).…”

Section: Structure and Behaviour Of A Product Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Function and property reasoning are found with a sound base in engineering design (Gero, 1990; Howard and Andreasen, 2013; Vermaas, 2013). Andreasen et al (2014) contributed with the articulation of the domain theory and the link model where the latter specifically can be applied for reasoning about functions and properties of both the product and the use activity. Property reasoning and property modeling (Andreasen et al, 2015) provide insight into the background for this type of mind-set approach with a description of property decomposition patterns to allow an identification of properties or qualities of sub-systems (Mørup, 1993).…”

Section: State Of the Artmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identification of critical technology building blocks

Ravn

Mortensen

Hvam

2017

Concurrent Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

 Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

show abstract

Domain Theory, Its Models and Concepts

Cited by 17 publications

References 17 publications

The Religious Struggle Framework: Religious Experience from Struggle to Transformation

The Religious Struggle Framework: Religious Experience from Struggle to Transformation

Towards a Debate on the Positioning of Engineering Design

Identification of critical technology building blocks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About