Domain State Diagnosis in Rock Magnetism: Evaluation of Potential Alternatives to the Day Diagram

Abstract

The Day diagram is used extensively in rock magnetism for domain state diagnosis. It has been shown recently to be fundamentally ambiguous for 10 sets of reasons. This ambiguity highlights the urgency for adopting suitable alternative approaches to identify the domain state of magnetic mineral components in rock magnetic studies. We evaluate 10 potential alternative approaches here and conclude that four have value for identifying data trends, but, like the Day diagram, they are affected by use of bulk parameters that compromise domain state diagnosis in complex samples. Three approaches based on remanence curve and hysteresis loop unmixing, when supervised by independent data to avoid nonuniqueness of solutions, provide valuable component‐specific information that can be linked by inference to domain state. Three further approaches based on first‐order reversal curve diagrams provide direct domain state diagnosis with varying effectiveness. Environmentally important high‐coercivity hematite and goethite are represented with variable effectiveness in the evaluated candidate approaches. These minerals occur predominantly in noninteracting single‐domain particle assemblages in paleomagnetic contexts, so domain state diagnosis is more critical for ferrimagnetic minerals. Treating the high‐coercivity component separately following normal rock magnetic procedures allows focus on the more vexing problem of diagnosing domain state in ferrimagnetic mineral assemblages. We suggest a move away from nondiagnostic methods based on bulk parameters and adoption of approaches that provide unambiguous component‐specific domain state identification, among which various first‐order reversal curve‐based approaches provide diagnostic information.

Nano‐Magnetite Aggregates in Red Soil on Low Magnetic Bedrock, Their Changes During Source‐Sink Transfer, and Implications for Paleoclimate Studies

“…In the Day diagram, the data of the red soil and lake sediment samples plot in a region of mixed SP, SSD, and MD particles ( Figure S6). Despite the criticism on the significance of the Day plot (Roberts et al, 2018), we think that the results can be considered as a rough estimate of similar portions of SSD and MD, plus a…”

Characterization and Quantification of Magnetofossils Within Abyssal Manganese Nodules From the Western Pacific Ocean and Implications for Nodule Formation

“…FORC diagrams provide diagnostic information about the presence of particles with different magnetic domain states; however, it remains a challenge to quantify the contribution of each domain state type in mixed samples. IRM acquisition curve decomposition can provide first‐order estimation of magnetic component concentrations, although it is based on mathematical model fitting without necessarily representing physical reality or the domain state of constituent particles (Heslop, ; Roberts et al, ). In addition to nonuniqueness of solutions and the need to supervise solutions with other constraints, the signal‐to‐noise ratio of measured data is a challenge for IRM curve decomposition.…”

Iron‐biomineralizing organelle in magnetotactic bacteria: function, synthesis and preservation in ancient rock samples

“…G. Isothermal remanent magnetization (IRM) and anhysteretic remanent magnetization (AMR) measured on samples allow to construct Egli Diagrams. This representation separates clusters of MTB magnetite (biogenic soft, BS, with low coercivity, and biogenic hard, BH, with a higher coercivity mostly linked with their elongation) from other forms, but this technique is time‐consuming and complex (Roberts et al ., 2019). H. Trace element partition coefficients normalized to iron content for MTB and abiotic magnetite.…”