2016
DOI: 10.1111/jora.12261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domain Specificity in Adolescents’ Concepts of Laws: Associations Among Beliefs and Behavior

Abstract: Using detailed vignettes and scale measures, concepts of laws regulating domain-specific issues and engagement in delinquency were assessed among 340 9th through 12th graders (M = 16.64, SD = 1.37). Adolescents distinguished between laws that regulate moral, drug-related prudential, conventional, personal, and multifaceted issues in their criterion judgments and justifications. Youths' ratings of the importance of laws, obligation to obey laws, and deserved punishment for breaking different laws also followed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

4
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adolescence is an active time for civic engagement, during which youth are reflecting on their role within broader society and forming beliefs about which social problems are personally relevant and meaningful (Yates & Youniss, 1998). Prior research has shown that adolescents have a complex and nuanced understanding of a variety of social issues, reflected in their beliefs about the causes and consequences of poverty (Flanagan & Tucker, 1999;Mistry, Brown, Chow, & Collins, 2012), their awareness of racial inequality (Flanagan, Syvertsen, Gill, Gallay, & Cumsille, 2009), and their concern for the regulation of crime (Flanagan, 2013;Oosterhoff & Metzger, 2017). Research also indicates that youth form a more nuanced and complex understanding of these issues with age (Flanagan et al, 2014).…”
Section: The Development Of Youths' Social Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Adolescence is an active time for civic engagement, during which youth are reflecting on their role within broader society and forming beliefs about which social problems are personally relevant and meaningful (Yates & Youniss, 1998). Prior research has shown that adolescents have a complex and nuanced understanding of a variety of social issues, reflected in their beliefs about the causes and consequences of poverty (Flanagan & Tucker, 1999;Mistry, Brown, Chow, & Collins, 2012), their awareness of racial inequality (Flanagan, Syvertsen, Gill, Gallay, & Cumsille, 2009), and their concern for the regulation of crime (Flanagan, 2013;Oosterhoff & Metzger, 2017). Research also indicates that youth form a more nuanced and complex understanding of these issues with age (Flanagan et al, 2014).…”
Section: The Development Of Youths' Social Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critical consciousness theory describes how young people, particularly those from marginalized groups, recognize and analyze structural injustice (Watts, Diemer, & Voight, 2011). Age-related changes in youths' social-cognitive development are thought to lead to greater recognition of structural inequality for all youth across adolescence (Flanagan et al, 2014), and likewise, youth are able to recognize structural causes of several different social issues, including racial biases, economic inequality, crime, and poverty (Diemer, Rapa, Park, & Perry, 2017;Flanagan et al, 2014;Oosterhoff & Metzger, 2017). Yet with age, increased autonomy, and heightened exposure to discrimination and oppression, youth from economically disadvantaged or historically oppressed backgrounds may have greater personal experiences with structural inequality and thus experience greater concerns about social issues that reflect inequality.…”
Section: Demographic Differences In Youths' Concerns About Social Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior research indicates that youth believe that government is obligated to protect citizens' safety and property by enacting laws that prevent harm and property destruction (Oosterhoff & Metzger, 2017). Results from this study suggest that youth who have personally experienced physical harm, threat, and property damage are generally less satisfied with government, potentially because government has failed to uphold its obligation to ensure life, liberty, and protect their safety.…”
Section: Victimized Youth Endorse Greater Discontent With Governmentmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Although prior research documents that American youth believe government has an obligation to enact laws that protect people from harm and property damage (Oosterhoff & Metzger, 2017), this belief was not directly tested in this study. Future research is thus needed to directly test whether links between victimization, beliefs about government, and political participation are explained by perceptions that government violated the social contract.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The DPM framework may be applied to adolescent delinquency. Engagement in delinquency often entails defiance of authority, violations of social rules, and threats to personal security (Oosterhoff & Metzger, 2016). Thus, engaging in delinquency directly conflicts with many of the principles central to RWA, including obedience of authority, structure, and maintenance of social order, and contradicts the theorized underlying motivational goals of social conformity and security.…”
Section: Rwa Sdo and Adolescent Delinquencymentioning
confidence: 99%