2013
DOI: 10.1039/9781849737531-00061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domain Sizes in Triglyceride Crystal Networks by 1H Spin-diffusion NMR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fat blends were subject to different crystallization rates by applying either a very fast or a moderate to slow cooling from the melt; thus, crystallites growth and size are expected to be different. , The proton spin-diffusion method was applied in combination with a double-quantum (DQ) dipolar filter to select the magnetization of the most rigid/crystalline phase. Other magnetization filters can also be employed to select either the low- or the high-molecular mobility spin populations. ,, To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to estimate the thickness of TAG crystallites in fat systems by 1 H spin-diffusion NMR, after we presented the idea at the “NMR in Foods” conference in 2012 . Comparison of NMR results with crystallite thickness determined by Scherrer analysis of the first order diffraction peak from SAXS data is discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fat blends were subject to different crystallization rates by applying either a very fast or a moderate to slow cooling from the melt; thus, crystallites growth and size are expected to be different. , The proton spin-diffusion method was applied in combination with a double-quantum (DQ) dipolar filter to select the magnetization of the most rigid/crystalline phase. Other magnetization filters can also be employed to select either the low- or the high-molecular mobility spin populations. ,, To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to estimate the thickness of TAG crystallites in fat systems by 1 H spin-diffusion NMR, after we presented the idea at the “NMR in Foods” conference in 2012 . Comparison of NMR results with crystallite thickness determined by Scherrer analysis of the first order diffraction peak from SAXS data is discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30,35,37 To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to estimate the thickness of TAG crystallites in fat systems by 1 H spindiffusion NMR, after we presented the idea at the "NMR in Foods" conference in 2012. 41 Comparison of NMR results with crystallite thickness determined by Scherrer analysis of the first order diffraction peak from SAXS data is discussed.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%