2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domain Model Explains Propagation Dynamics and Stability of Histone H3K27 and H3K36 Methylation Landscapes

Abstract: Graphical Abstract Highlights d Quantitative analysis of K27 and K36 methylation over several histone generations d Computational model invokes the existence of distinct methylation state domains d K27me3 on pre-existing histones stimulates the rate of de novo K27me3 establishment d K27/K36 methylation antagonism enhances stability of epigenetic states

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
75
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
22
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the so-called domain model of histone propagation, preexisting methyl marks on K27 and K36 of the histone H3 tail mutually antagonize their respective methylation rates, such that the site of incorporation of new histones determines their ultimate methylation state. This mechanism is thought to enhance the stability of epigenetic states (Alabert et al, 2020). Based on such findings and our data presented here, we expect a highly diversified impact of the cell cycle on the epigenetic landscape.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In the so-called domain model of histone propagation, preexisting methyl marks on K27 and K36 of the histone H3 tail mutually antagonize their respective methylation rates, such that the site of incorporation of new histones determines their ultimate methylation state. This mechanism is thought to enhance the stability of epigenetic states (Alabert et al, 2020). Based on such findings and our data presented here, we expect a highly diversified impact of the cell cycle on the epigenetic landscape.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…H3K36me2 Forms the Boundaries of H3K27me3 Spread in Wild-Type and H3K27me2 in K27M H3K36 methylation has been shown to inhibit the deposition of H3K27 methylation, and H3K27me3 rarely coexists with H3K36me2/3 on the same nucleosomes (Schmitges et al, 2011;Yuan et al, 2011). Considerable insight into the differences in spreading of H3K27 methylation between H3K27M mutant and wild-type cells can be obtained from its interaction with the intermediate K36 methylation level, H3K36me2, which has previously been shown to oppose intergenic propagation of H3K27me2/3 (Alabert et al, 2020;Lu et al, 2016;Stafford et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H3K9me3 was in turn established through the addition of a third methyl group to pre-existing H3K9me2 in G 1 /S, and from newly synthesized H3 acquiring 3 methyl groups in G 2 /M. In contrast, H3K27me2 was largely the result of unmodified residues acquiring 2 methyl groups in G 2 /M, while H3K27me3 re-establishment patterns were similar to H3K9me3, but clearly antagonized by the H3K36me3 mark (Zee et al, 2012;Alabert et al, 2020).…”
Section: Post-replicative Re-establishment Of Histone Marks and Chrommentioning
confidence: 96%