2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2022.104499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Domain invariant covariate selection (Di-CovSel) for selecting generalized features across domains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, a descriptive analysis of the capacity to align the variability of the domains was done by visualizing the projection scores from all models, including a PCA analysis as a benchmark. After this, the predictive power of all models on the nine target domains was compared in terms of the root mean squared error of prediction (RMSEP), Rp2, prediction bias (Bias) and the standard error of prediction (SEP) 20 . Notably, we assessed the performance of each model using the same test set split that was used in Anderson et al 22 and Passos and Mishra, 23 that is, including samples from Season 4, to investigate “out‐of‐domain” generalization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First, a descriptive analysis of the capacity to align the variability of the domains was done by visualizing the projection scores from all models, including a PCA analysis as a benchmark. After this, the predictive power of all models on the nine target domains was compared in terms of the root mean squared error of prediction (RMSEP), Rp2, prediction bias (Bias) and the standard error of prediction (SEP) 20 . Notably, we assessed the performance of each model using the same test set split that was used in Anderson et al 22 and Passos and Mishra, 23 that is, including samples from Season 4, to investigate “out‐of‐domain” generalization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that case, the differences between the domains are penalized too much and model generalization may suffer. In practice, an optimal trade‐off between explaining a large portion of the variance in bold-italicy and domain invariability can be found by tuning λ by means of cross‐validation 20 …”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this task, domain adaptation can be used to train an ML model on the spectra acquired under stationary conditions (the source domain), akin to a manufacturer collecting offline data in a laboratory, and aid transfer of these models to the moving conditions on a conveyor line (the task domain). Matrix or kernel-based methods have previously been used for domain adaptation of 1D NIR spectra to find projections between domains [ 21 , 22 ] or to also extract discriminative features to be used for a main learning task [ 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 ]. Ensemble methods that maximize model diversity and prediction similarity in the new domain data have also been used to increase the probability that transferable correlations are used [ 27 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, efforts were devoted to the development of analytical solutions that allow to move the knowledge acquired from one site or data source to another where our interest is focused, such as in the activities of scale-up, product transfer, and process monitoring. , A variety of model transfer approaches were developed for handling specifically spectroscopic data. Techniques such as partial least-squares (PLS) model inversion, Joint-Y PLS, calibration/model transfer, ,, and, more recently, transfer learning ,,, and domain adaptation offer different paths to achieve the aforementioned goals. These methods address partially the aforementioned challenge of connecting multiple sites, but their objective is not to provide a global management platform but instead a way to transfer existing knowledge to a new context of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%